Thank you skieslimit for your interesting post

This is a large copy and paste, apparently from this site, and there are many errors in it, not the least being frequent logical fallacies, mostly dealing with the argument from incredulity and the like ... "Information" ... I've dealt with that elsewhere, that horse don't run.

I also checked your website and found several articles rife with error, falsehood, misinformation and more fallacies. Thermodynamics? ... really.

I don't see any point in discussing these errors unless you are the author. If you want to discuss them then I expect you to furnish the arguments in your own words.

I'd be happy to discuss the concept of "information" as it is applied by people like the author of your article if you want, but post it in your own words.

If you are not the author then you are guilty of plagiarism, which is essentially lying and claiming someone else's work as your own. In science this is enough to get you fired and never hired again. How do you feel about lying? Why do creationists need to lie if creationism is true?

This is just an assertion, based on your own biases and your ?stolen? post that you should have reviewed to check for fallacies and errors before posting.

It looks to me like the ones doing the conning are your article authors (they conned you) and you (providing false information and not crediting the authors).

I also noticed that you did not answer any of my points about how it is wrong to imply social concerns to any science, but went right ahead and did it anyway. Do you read for content or just look for places to drop copy and paste articles from dubious sources?

See if you can provide some content of your own eh?

Enjoy.

Note: [color:"green"]My time (too) is limited, so I post on threads of particular interest to me, but I cannot guarantee a reply to all responses (particularly if they do not discuss the issue/s), and I expect other people to do the same. Thank you for your consideration.[/color]