Russ, you have some pretty basic misconceptions here. I'll just discuss the first for now (seeing as it is the basis of your argument, and if it is false then the whole argument is invalid).
Evolution is possibly the grandest social deception ever devised. I cannot express how amazed I am that anyone—anyone at all—believes this ridiculous and completely illogical idea.
:
The real reason for the promotion of evolution is to create a social climate for the centralization of power and the promotion of certain, otherwise, unethical activities. For these morally deplete power brokers,
Evolution - [color:"purple"]
the change in hereditary traits in populations from generation to generation[/color] - is a process that can be observed in everyday life, it is a fact, and this fact is the basis for the Theory of Evolution (ToE) and together those two are the foundation for the science of Evolutionary Biology. The science of Evolutionary Biology studies the change in hereditary traits in all populations from generation to generation to generation ... and it tests the ToE against all the evidence, the vast diversity of life we know of from present day, history, the fossil record and genetics.
It is a
natural science:
In science, the term natural science refers to a rational approach to the study of the universe, which is understood as obeying rules or laws of natural origin. The term natural science is also used to distinguish those fields that use the scientific method to study nature from the social sciences, which use the scientific method to study human behavior and society; and from the formal sciences, such as mathematics and logic, which use a different methodology.
:
:
Natural sciences form the basis for the applied sciences. Together, the natural and applied sciences are distinguished from the social sciences on the one hand, and from the humanities, theology and the arts on the other. Though Mathematics, statistics, and computer science are not considered natural sciences, they provide many tools and frameworks used within the natural sciences.
:
Alongside this traditional usage, the phrase natural sciences is also sometimes used more narrowly to refer to its everyday usage, that is, related to natural history. In this sense "natural sciences" may refer to the biological sciences and perhaps also the earth sciences, as distinguished from the physical sciences, including astronomy, physics, and chemistry.
Natural science in general, and evolution in particular, doesn't cause\involve\
imply any social impact other than to provide a sound basis to understand the truth about objective reality of the natural world\universe.
Evolution in particular, and science in general, is not concerned with social philosophy or morality - mathematics makes no moral statement. Physics - in spite of developing atomic bombs - makes no moral statement. Chemistry - in spite of developing nerve gas and poisons - makes no moral statement. Evolution makes no moral statement.
Evil people will use any concept to justify evil, but that does not make the concept evil, as I sure you would agree - seeing as the bible has been used as an excuse to do evil things.
Your premise is false. Evolution doesn't tell society what to do.
By the way, I'm new here so I was wondering what the 5 stars under my name (vs 4 under yours) mean? Just curious, as I haven't been here that long.
Enjoy.
Note: [color:"green"]My time (too) is limited, so I post on threads of particular interest to me, but I cannot guarantee a reply to all responses (particularly if they do not discuss the issue/s), and I expect other people to do the same. Thank you for your consideration.[/color]
