I was exposed to evolution at times throughout school, not often enough to where it destroyed my faith, but enough to confuse me.
Later in life I began to question evolution and many times I questioned the existance of God. In questioning both, this lead me to read more. l. I began to watch videos of evolution / creation. I was astounded at the other side, for once I go tto hear scientistis giving their view on creation. I saw debates between them.

I have absolutely no doubt in my mind (in my opinion) that evolution is possibly the biggest lie ever told to mankind. To me, it is nothing more than an antigod philosophy, man-made religion. It is not science, if anything it is antiscience and in fact an insult to true science. Real science is wonderful and there should be no need whatsoever to implant bias beliefs into that area or fiction.

Evolution belongs in the religious studies class, not the science class. It relies totally on "faith", because it is only a theory. Nobody saw a big bang, nobody video taped the unfolding of life in the beginning, , yet we are told when it happened, how it happened, what happened and we are really not allowed to think for ourselves because the men in white coats have already told you and me that it is science, therefore it is not up for question or "faith". what we are according to the evolutionist scientist, is nothing more than an evolved organism, or basically an advanced ape. So hate to tell you guys but our relatives are locked up in zoos (if we are to believe this). This means that the very fact we are having this discussion is pointless. If we are just ape like creatures (or advanced), we have no point to our beginning, no point to our life and a dead end to look forward to. IT makes you wonder why the "big explosion" bothered to happen at all. Who gave it the ingredients for life and intelligence? Did all the right things just come together at just the right time and in just the right way that everything in that explosion is what we see now? Just the outcome of billions of years and chance random processes? This is absolutely fictitious, it is man's idea. That is all it is, what is it doing in a science classroom? How insulting to education. If one wishes to believe in such a theory they are welcome to, but be honest about it. So far it remains the "theory" of evolution....not yet an established fact. Hey, they've had billions of years (in their mind) to come up with a story, is this it?

Why should someone's theory be accepted as scientific fact simply because it suits an antigod agenda? Surely science should be taught as science and the bias beliefs left out of it. Let the evidence speak for itself. where the evidence takes you is anybody's guess, but should not be orchestrated by scientist who has an agenda.

But instead, we have textbooks with animated drawings to tell us how we used to look (with no evidence whatsoever). To tell us how horses used to look "with no evidence whatsoever". The horse theory was proven fake many years ago, yet STILL turns up in scientific textbooks. They are gradually removing it from some, but not all. IT's an embarrassment even to some of the top evolutionists. Egan would know about these kinds of frauds I am sure. But the fact remains that they SHOULD be exposed because they are STILL turning up in scientific textbooks. And that goes also for the Evolution of the human embryo. done deliberately to make them look like unevolved fish with gill slits. Come to find out, the guy responsible had faked the lot.

There is STILL no clear evidence of any missing links. Yes there have been many so-called missing links over the years so far all fakes. Variation within a kind is not evolution. certainly a dog will never be a cat or any other animal. Animals are just what they are, regardless of the differences within the kind (e.g. german shepherd compared to a poodle). A giraff and an elephant, totally unique. As is everything and every human being down to their finger prints and intricit genetic code which is more complicated and vast than any computer or library on earth. Yet all that apparently came from "chance random processes all from an...explosion" (according to the evolutionist). I dont know about you, but I have never seen order come from an explosion. Only chaos. How does life come from non life? HOw does life start, much-less be sustained unless everything is there in balance? The planets are all in alignment in the right way, if not nothing could exist. The temperature/atmosphere has already got to be in exactly the right way in order to be friendly to life and again, sustain life. How is it that the sun lights us by day and the moon gives us a light by night and we attribute all that to "chance". This includes plants, foods, everything. all nothing more than the result of billions of years? I guess for me as a believer, I find it astounding how anybody can really ignore the idea of intelligence and design and "care" behind all this.

Now if the earth was billions of years old as we are told, we would be absolutely inundated with fossil evidence coming out of our ears of evolution. There wouldn't be ANY search for missing links, you'd have them everywhere. Museums would probably be rather boring. There would not be any arguments because the results would speak for themselves over and over. any creation scientist would be extinct himself! He wouldn't exist and if he did, he'd tidal waved by evidence....how is it that evolutionists try to avoid debates now with creationists because it does "not do the cause any good"?

Instead, they are desperate to find the missing link. When they discover fossils, they attempt to fit the evidence into their preconceived beliefs, rather than take the fossils as they are. So if they find a human bone and miles away find an ape bone, this means they come from the same body (yes this has been done). Therefore over two bones, they decide to draw us a picture of how we looked. These types of fraudery were not uncommon.

One example is they built an entire ape like/human creature around "one tooth". The tooth turned out to be the tooth of an extinct pig. Yes they had fooled people for quite sometime.

Also we have the billions and billions of years ago time line thrown onto it all. This time frame also appears to grow by another billion or so years as time goes on. If you throw enough time on history, you can come up with anything and and even a ludicrous suggestion can suddenly become believeable.

Certainly the idea of a big bang, an awesome explosion that produced all of this (over billions of years of evolution) is something they think is logic and scientific, yet they laugh at our belief in a divine intelligent creator....

There is no doubt in my mind that there is an agenda behind this because it is simply not science, it is deliberate and there have been evolutionists who have walked away from evolution after they discovered the undeniable imprint of a designer under their microscopes e.g. Gary Parker, Roger Oakland. They and those like them are the most lethal enemy to the evolutionists because they have already been there.

There is a book that is growing in popularity amongst students. More and more students are beginning to stand up in science and question their science teachers and evolution which is becoming quite alarming for these teachers. As kids get to hear the other side, they begin to ask some tough questions. The book is called "refuting evolution" by Jonathan Sarfati.