OK, here's an idea...

Gather information from both sides and see which one makes the most sense. There are plenty of links on that page to get you started doing just that.

Unfortunately, what I've found egan is that most people only listen to what they want to hear and this is a poor way to gather the information you need to discern truth.

Is this why you only listened to 15 minutes of this?

Know thyself.

I suggest you give it a fair shake and hear it out, otherwise you are guilty of the very thing you accuse "religious" people of.

Also, this link was not about a debate over evolution. It was a peek at the iceberg that is a global conspiracy.

So, now I challenge you to be an honest evolutionist and watch the whole thing and then feel free to watch any of the numerous Hovind debates with evolutionists that exist on YouTube.

By the way, the purposefully deceptive term "micro-evolution" is actually a divergence within a "kind" resulting from a loss of information, NOT a creative process. The video deals with this.

Again egan, my beef with evolution has nothing to do with preconceived ideas or desires about Christianity. If I were an atheist or agnostic, I would be ashamed to accept this indescribably silly idea. Whether soup-to-cell or cell-to-man, evolution is magic: "Look at this 'evidence' so we can keep you from seeing the strings".

Allele frequencies? Show me a beneficial mutation. Show me a common mutation or "micro-evolution" that does not involve the loss of information.

Bottom line. We should all just grow up and admit that design requires a designer. I know it's not easy, but then good things seldom are. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />