SB 277 Lawsuit - Claims For Relief (The Nitty-Gritty)

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Down to the Nitty-Gritty of the SB 277 Lawsuit�

Yes, this is a lot to read. But, here, after laying out the situation for
the Court, comes the details of exactly what laws the people responsible
for SB 277�s passing, and implementation, broke. Yes, the language is
strong and forceful, for it has to be.

What you are about to read is the essence of America � the expression, in
language our forefathers would have used, to state what we, as Americans
expect. The attorneys who wrote these words pulled no punches. They told
it like it is.

We are on the march�

Below, is from the lawsuit First Amended Complaint document:

First Claim for Relief Against All Defendants (Violation of Freedom of
Religion, Assembly, Parental Rights, 42 U.S.C. � 1983)

136. Plaintiffs incorporate by reference the foregoing paragraphs of this
Complaint as though fully set forth herein.

137. Defendants deprived and continue to deprive Plaintiffs of their right
to Free Exercise of religion, as secured by the First Amendment and made
applicable to the states by the Fourteenth Amendment, by discriminating
against Plaintiffs and their children because of the Plaintiffs�
religiously-motivated conduct in making exemption claims, including
declining certain vaccines derived from or containing ingredients to which
Plaintiffs object, including aborted fetal cells.

138. Defendants are also depriving Plaintiffs and their children of the
right to freedom of assembly by depriving children of the right to attend
secular or religious private schools of their choosing and by requiring
that both public and private schools deny admission and education to
children with PBEs.

139. Additionally, Defendants are infringing Plaintiffs� rights to control
the upbringing and education of their minor children according to the
religion, system of values, and moral norms they deem appropriate and their
rights to the care, custody, education of and association with their
children.

140. Defendants are enforcing SB 277 under color of State law and are
depriving and will continue to deprive Plaintiffs of numerous hybrid rights
secured by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution in
violation of 42 U.S.C. � 1983.

To read the entire article, click on:

http://bolenreport.com/sb-277-lawsuit-claims-relief-nitty-gritty/#more-4102