What is a Drivers License?

I thought it would be interesting to share another bit of information.

As I mentioned the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) earlier, the UCC provides the process for preserving your rights by preventing you from entering into unknown contracts in sections 1-207 and 1-203.

In short, this says that by signing the words "Without Prejudice" below your signature on a contract, you preserve your rights and prevent yourself from entering into any contracts or agreements that you are not aware of. This, in effect, prevents you from accidentally losing your Constitutional rights.

Since a driver's license is a commerical contract because:

(1) you have to pay to get one, and

(2) you enter an agreement when you sign it,

it is indeed a commercial contract and is therefore governed by the UCC. (Did you know a traffic ticket is a financial "presentation" under UCC as well, and that when you sign it you're agreeing to pay? More on this later.)

So, my business partner decided to give it a try. When her license was up for renewal in Florida, she signed "Without Prejudice" next to her name.

Eventually, she recieved this letter from the Florida Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) (I've blacked out her private information and her signature to protect her privacy):



It basically said that there is a problem with your signature and you have to go down and get a new license. It sounds pretty nice and polite until you get to the part that says her current license would be revoked if she didn't comply.

Well, laura responded with this letter:



This letter explains to the DMV official that Laura has the legal right to place her signature this way and that he, in threatening to extinguish this legal contract with no legal basis, was operating outside the law. That's pretty serious.

Well, Laura never heard back from the DMV and her license was never cancelled.

This is another peek into the purposefully complex system that has been placed to prevent people from finding a way to regain their rights. Of course, the ability to regain your rights has to be in place, otherwise this contract law would not hold up in court. The sneaky (actually, very evil) designers of this law made it as hard as possible to find the process of remedy and recourse, but it is there, at UCC 1-207.

Here is a very good explaination of this section of UCC law:

The UCC Connection

Most lawers who know UCC law will know something about this section but they are normally not taught that this law applies to your legal relationship with the entity called the United States (the corporation). There are two other entities called the United States as well (this has been well-settled in the courts and I have a copy). They have been set up this way to be deceptive and to lure it's "citizens" to unknowingly give up their rights so they would unknowingly (and voluntarily) enter into contracts that require them to pay an otherwise illegal "income tax". The deception is deep, carefully constructed, and—as usual—all about money.

Now about traffic tickets.

Under UCC law, when a person tells you that you owe them money, unless you rebut the statement, it's assumed to be true. You have a limited time to present this rebuttal; Usually 45 days. It was written this way to favor banks and creditors.

When you are stopped by a police office and he gives you a ticket, he is making what the UCC calls a "presentment". This is a statement that you owe someone money. The officer makes you sign the presentment, usually under the implied threat that, if you don't, you may go to jail.

When you sign this presentment, you agree to either:

(1) pay the amount requested, or

(2) excise your remedy and recourse by taking it to an administrator (traffic "judges" are often not judges at all) and state your reasons for not oweing the money. Of course, the administrator is seldom elected and gets a paycheck from the same person the officer does, so your chances of receiving a fair remedy is slim.

Now, if you go to the administrator (in a setting that looks and feels amazingly like a real court room) and state that you were simply exercising your right to travel, guaranteed to you by the Constitution, he will not recoginize the authority of the document because you're on foreign soil. Why, because you're in a room with the banner (flag) of the corporate (yellow-fringed) United States flying (usually right next to the administrator) and that entity has no legal binding to the constitution.

The galley where the public sits, which is behind a wall (although a very short wall), is legally, a different location (a different room) than the one that has the yellow-fringed flag flying. The galley is under the purview of the flag flying out in front of the courthouse, which normally is not the yellow-fringed flag.

It's all a matter of commercial law, contracts, and jurisdiction.

If you gain a knowlege of these things, you will begin to see how the international banking cartel has devised this deception and dragged the good people of the U.S. into another law system. The concept is really not complicated. Only the reading of the laws are, intentionally.

To make the point concerning rebutting a presentment clear, let me tell you this story.

I have some friends who own an herb store and had an employee who was running into financial trouble. The employee lost their house and my friends (very good people) offered that the employee and their family stay in a trailer behind their property until they could get on their feet again. They made a deal that this person would help with chores around the property as compensation for them using the trailer.

Once the person found a second job, saved some money and got into an apartment, they left the trailer and all was well, until...

A few months later, my friends received a letter stating that they owed this person a lot of money. I don't remember the exact amount but it was significant. My friends, thinking this person was out of their minds, simply threw the letter away.

A couple months later, my friends received a court summons, requiring them to apper; They were being sued.

The person whom my friends had helped, stated that they had sent a "presentment" to my friends stating how much was owed and my friends had never rebutted the presentent. My friends told the judge that they just threw the paper away because they thought it was ridiculuos.

This person promptly won the case and my friends were required to pay the full amount to the person or risk having a lien on their property.

So, if you don't actively defend your rights, you lose them by default. The system is purposefully set up this way to favor the bankers and creditors (bankers too, usually) and to harm those who don't know law. They will tell you, "ignorance of the law is no excuse". Of course "the law" (commercial, though it is and not "real" in the way we think of it) would fill up a football stadium over three-feet deep.

Every U.S. state has adoped the UCC into it's own "codes". In Florida, for example, it's found in FS-671.

This corrupt and deceptive "yellow-fringe" system has also been duplicated in most countries around the world by the same small group of international bankers. You can see evidence of this when you see flags that contain the exact same yellow-fringe as the (corporate) U.S. flag does, Canada included.

If someone wants to stop paying income taxes, don't, unless you legally position yourself to do it legally. You could get into big trouble if you don't know what you're doing.

And to those who say, "But taxes are what pays the bills for the country."

Not so.

Your income taxes go to the Federal Reserve Bank; A privately-held corporation (not part of any government and held by the banking cartel I mentioned earlier). Money for the U.S. budget is created out of thin air by the same bank and loaned to the country with interest.

In other words, the very money you use to pay in taxes is actually paid to the very people who have deceptively lured you into commercial contracts that strip you of your rights. It is—in fact—the largest financial fraud in the history of the world.

If you're interested in more information, listen to this outstanding lecture by G. Edward Griffen, Author of the book,

"The Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look At the Federal Reserve"

Here is a link to the lecture:


I hope this helps someone see the big picture.

Return to the How The World Really Works forum







Return to the How The World Really Works forum