--RADIOMETRIC DATING and the BIBLE: A Historical Review~
--ICR/HMM (Please continue by clicking on the website address at bottom.)

The Lord Jesus Christ clearly affirmed in Mark 10:6 that "from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female,"—not 4.6 billion years after the beginning of the creation! The very concept of billions of years of a groaning, travailing creation (Romans 8:22) with animals suffering and dying during the long geologic ages before God could get around to creating men and women in His own image, is an insult to a loving, omniscient, omnipotent God. Death is, under such a concept, not "the wages of sin" as the Bible says (Romans 6:23), but the method of "creation," as evolutionists say.

Therefore, there must be a true and satisfying answer to this troublesome radiometry problem. The earth is young, and the data must confirm this, if they are rightly understood.

God has provided the basic direction for our research on this vital issue in II Peter 3:3-6. This passage clearly informs us that the unique processes during two brief periods of history—Creation and the Flood—make the uniformitarian assumptions in the use of radio-decay rates for dating earth history quite invalid.

* Dr. Henry Morris is Founder and President Emeritus of ICR. [check it out, below)
-------
<http://www.icr.org/article/radiometric-dating-bible-historical-review/>
------------

--The Sun Alters Radioactive Decay Rates
-By: Brian Thomas, M.S.

If the assumption of a constant rate is incorrect, then conclusions built upon that assumption are suspect, including certain dates assigned to artifacts and earth materials.

This actually does not surprise those scientists willing to investigate the possibility that radioactive decay rates are, in fact, not stable. For example, it has been reported that dates for the same rock from different nuclear decay systems are usually discordant.3 Also, whenever rocks that were witnessed forming--as when lava hardens--were later dated with methods that depend on these supposedly constant rates, they were always "dated" orders of magnitude older than the known, actual age.4

The implications of inconsistent decay rates in radioactive elements are vast. And those inconsistencies are real, calling into question evolutionists' adamant assertions of an ancient age for the earth.~~
-- Check it out! Evolutionists are wrong!
------
<http://www.icr.org/article/sun-alters-radioactive-decay-rates/>
----------

--New Direct Fossil Dating Technique
--Promises to Fail!
--
Researchers would be better advised to interpret the geologic record using the framework of Biblical history—which matches the evidence indicating that the majority of sedimentary layers, and the fossils they contain, resulted from a Global Deluge just thousands of years ago.

--<http://www.icr.org/article/new-direct-fossil-dating-technique/>