|
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,707
Master Elite Member
|
There are lots of people who are skeptical of claims for the ability random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life Yet not to believe it seems to be seen as non scientific to those who do. The suggestion that it could have happened another way seems to be a challenge to their belief system and considered non scientific. And that is especially so if it happens to include a Creator who happens to be the God of Genesis and of the Bible itself. Why is that have to be thought of as non scientific and without logic and reason. Especially if God used what they consider to be of Science to Create and Form the Universe and everything else we see. It seems public schools want to teach our children what to think and not to think and define for them also what is scientific and what is not scientific instead of letting them think for themselves. All possibilites should be presented and all claims need to be challenged to be truly educated instead of indoctrinated..
|
|
|
|
|