Question: Did this man suffer because of circumcision or because it was not done correctly? I am awaiting YOUR reply?

I know many people who have suffered because of cars. Should they be outlawed? I know those who have been unfairly damaged by metal beams, steering wheels, beds, cigarettes, medicine, doctors, dentists, roofs, trees, cops musical triangles and birth. Should there be laws against these as well?

It's easy to appeal to emotion for the purposes of trying to get a law passed when someone gets hurt because someone else does something wrong, but that is stooping to the level of the mainstream media.

There's good saying in constitutional law circles that says:

"Hard cases make bad law."

This means that you can't take something that turned out bad for someone and create a law based on it. That's why the U.S. has arrived where it is today in terms of political correctness—the same political correctness you despise.

The bottom line still stands. This man does not suffer because of circumcision, just as I didn't suffer because of dentistry. He suffers from unskilled, untrained, unqualified or uncaring doctors. There's a big difference.


He should deal with it the same way I deal with the fact that I have had my childhood and most of my prime years stolen from me by evil men: Turn it into good by helping others deal with the problem.

Does that mean I'm out trying to stop dentistry? Am I going to support a law taking away people's rights? No and no. I'm helping people deal with amalgam which is the real issue.

Again, you're throwing the baby out.


OK... here, you are overstepping the bounds of fair discussion. You should know better.

I believe in truth and when information conflicts, we need to look it over and see what is really truth and what is propaganda.

Is the Bible what it claims to be? If so, you're not just wrong, you're very wrong.

I've studied the Book and found it to be true and authentic and to be what it claims to be. Considering this, millions of Christians that have come to the same conclusion as me would not be very happy if you started taking rights away because you don't like them or because you believe differently.

You seem to be interested in rights only when they agree with your ethics—your religion—your beliefs. When they don't, well...

Do you see the contradiction in your ethics here?


People generally think of themselves as thay want themselves to be, yet, we are defined by what we do.

If you ever decide to hold yourself up to the hard reality of what you do, you cannot escape that fact that you're not being honest with yourself. You DO fall somewhere on the political scale, you simply prefer being obsecure because it requires less accountability.

Circumcision is a Christian right, and is therefore a human right. It may not be important to you, but it is very important to many besides you.

If you don't like it, great, but if you outlaw it because you don't like it, you need to look yourself in the mirror and discover where in the political spectrum you really do fall.


Carla,

The most valuable journey of self-discovery you can ever take is to read the Book, cover-to-cover. If you're brave enough to face yourself, you can do it.

It is more than you think it is, a lot more. From prophecy to gematria to boundless insight, it is amazing and revealing and insightful and will change you for the better if you are willing to put forth some intellectual effort and open it up, moreso than you have already, as you have stated.