|
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 30,867
Master Elite Member
|
In Freedom,
Charles Erwin
The Truth behind Executive
Orders and Martial Law
On March 16, 2012 President Obama signed the National Defense Resource
Preparedness Executive Order, which "could" open the door for
implementation of peacetime Martial Law in the United States.
Executive Orders are nothing new. Democratic and Republican Presidents
have used Executive Orders to have their way with America for decades.
However, the ugly truth associated with every Executive
Order signed is Executive Orders are
unconstitutional.
What makes all Executive Orders unconstitutional? We need
only refer to the Constitution for an answer. Article I Section
1 of the Constitution reads as follows:
"All
legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United
States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of
Representatives."
The Constitution is quite clear "All legislative Powers" are
granted to a "Congress of the United
States" consisting of a "Senate
and House of
Representatives". The Founding Fathers of our
Country made sure no one man could become a dictator while
sitting in the office of President. This means Presidents
have no "legislative
Powers" to pass any of their dictatorial Executive
Orders. The lack of constitutional "legislative Powers" to
pass all Executive Orders means all Executive Orders are
unconstitutional. It is really that simple in a Country where
governmental leaders respect and uphold the Constitution-which it
appears we no longer possess.
So, why do most "Senate
and House of Representative"
members allow Presidents to take on dictatorial powers using
unconstitutional Executive Orders? It is because the majority of the
people in the "Senate and House of Representatives" work for wealthy
people of Special Interest instead of the American
people. Most members of Congress know "All legislative Powers"
are granted to a "Senate
and House of
Representatives", yet they allow the President to sign
these worthless pieces of paper with no protest. This is not just a
Federal issue. State and Local representatives have the power to
protect us from unconstitutional laws but they give us no protection.
It is as if most representatives in all levels of government have
abandoned the Constitution. Our Police and Military are also involved
in this epidemic of ignoring the Constitution. After much Media
brainwashing and no protection from Federal, State, or Local
governments, our Police and Military ignorantly force us to follow the
dictates of traitors violating the Constitution. We are literally
enslaving ourselves because Police and Military are now trained to
enforce unconstitutional laws taking our rights instead of keeping
constitutional peace.
Now that we know the truth regarding unconstitutional
Executive Orders, let us turn our attention to Martial Law. The
following definition of Martial Law comes from Black's
Law Dictionary 5th edition:
Martial Law - "Exists when military
authorities carry on government or exercise various degrees of control
over civilians or civilian authorities in domestic
territory."
According to The Freedom Dictionary found
on the Internet, Martial Law has been used once on the national level
during the Civil War and once on the regional level during World War
II. Then again, just because Martial Law has been used in the past it
does not mean Martial Law is constitutional...now does
it?
The authority for government use of Martial Law on the
national level is suppose to come from Article I, Section 8, Clause
15 and Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 which read as
follows:
"To provide for calling
forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress
Insurrections and repel Invasions;"
"The President shall be
Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of
the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service
of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the
principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any
Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he
shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against
the United States, except in Cases of
Impeachment."
Well, we know Martial Law has been used on the national
level, but based on the above Articles from the Constitution, the
President or Congress have zero Martial Law power to use "military authorities" to gain "control over civilians or civilian authorities"
unless it is in "domestic territory"
like Guam or the Virgin Islands.
The Constitution states the "President
shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States,
and of the Militia of the several States". It also gives
the President the authority "To provide for
calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress
Insurrections and repel Invasions". There is absolutely no
authority at the national level allowing the President or Congress to
declare Martial Law "constitutionally" by using "military authorities" to gain "control over civilians or civilian authorities"
in a union State protected by the Constitution.
This makes perfect sense! Why would the Founding Fathers
create a Constitution and Country where Americans are free
sovereign Citizens only to have some President suspend the laws of the
nation using Martial Law to execute a military coup based on some
emergency? The Constitution dictates that the President can call
"forth the Militia to execute the Laws of
the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions", but
it does not say the President can use "military
authorities" to suspend the "Laws of
the Union" to gain "control over
civilians or civilian authorities" using Martial Law. As a
matter of truth, the term Martial Law does NOT appear in the
Constitution. In other words, government has no authority to declare
Martial Law for an emergency, or any other reason, because all
government authority in every union State must abide by the
Constitution. After all, it is the Constitution which binds all union
States...right?
There is a reason the Constitution allows the President to
call "forth the Militia to execute the Laws
of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions"
instead of using "military
authorities". That is because the "Militia" was made up of our fellow "civilians or civilian authorities" whereas the
"military" could encompass
Homeland Security, FBI, CIA, NSA, or foreign allied troops from NATO
with allegiance to the New World Order (NWO). We can be certain the
"Militia" of "civilians or civilian authorities" would not
disband the "Laws of the Union" when
the emergency was over, but who knows what the "military", made up of Homeland Security,
FBI, CIA, NSA, or foreign allied troops from NATO working for the NWO,
might attempt under an unconstitutional Martial Law
emergency.
On the regional level, Martial Law was declared by Governor Joseph B. Poindexter in the "domestic territory" of Hawaii on December 7, 1941 when Japanese warplanes bombed Pearl
Harbor. It is important to emphasize at the time Martial Law was
declared in Hawaii it was a "domestic
territory" and not a State of the union.
It is true Martial Law was later enacted in California, Oregon,
Washington, Arizona, and eventually throughout the entire Pacific
Coast of the United States during World War II. What Americans need to
realize is declaring Martial Law in a "domestic territory" is very different from
declaring martial law in a union State. In 1941, the "domestic territory" of Hawaii was not a union
State protected by the Constitution, but the union States like California, Oregon, Washington, and Arizona should
have been protected by the Federal Constitution and their State
Constitutions against Martial Law.
Pearl Harbor was
much like 9/11. It gave treasonous government officials the means to
violate the Constitution and take away your rights based on an
emergency. Declaring Martial Law in the "domestic territory" of Hawaii in 1941 did not
violate the Constitution because the Constitution applies to States
like California, Oregon,
Washington, and Arizona-not "domestic
territory" like Hawaii, Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico.
The very definition of Martial Law declares it can ONLY be enforced in
"domestic territory". Congress has
total authority over "domestic
territory" because "domestic
territory" like Hawaii, Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico are
NOT protected by the Constitution. On the other hand, the union States
should have been lawfully protected against Martial Law by the
Constitution. The reality is Martial Law falls under the Hierarchy of
Laws as a Law of Conquest. If all laws and rights are ever suspended
in America, then "We the People" will
no longer remain free. If Americans sit back and do nothing, our
nation will one day be conquered from within and handed over to the
New World Order under the pretext of an emergency requiring Martial
Law.
As you can see, the truth about Martial
Law is it is unconstitutional at the National/ Federal, State, and
Local levels because government or "military" employees have
no lawful authority to gain "control over
civilians or civilian authorities" within any union State
bound by the Constitution. So, what authority was
used during World War II to allow Martial Law to be implemented in
union States? The matter was taken to the judicial system of the
Supreme Court where eight or nine attorneys interpreted the
Constitution to benefit their fellow attorneys in government. The
Supreme Court decided the term Martial Law had no precise meaning.
This unconstitutional revelation allowed the judicial system and
government to define Martial Law to their liking. The Founding Fathers
did NOT create the Supreme Court with dictatorial powers to change the
meaning of the Constitution or interpret the Constitution to include
Martial Law powers. However, in this unconstitutional United States,
we've been tricked into believing the Supreme Court is supreme when
it is not supreme.
Based on the evidence, Executive Orders
and Martial Law are BOTH unconstitutional. The Constitution forbids
Presidential Executive Orders without "legislative Powers" and
the very concept of government employees declaring Martial Law to gain
"control over civilians or civilian
authorities" in America is repugnant to the Constitution,
yet somehow Martial Law was approved by a small group of attorneys in
the Supreme Court. It is obvious the Supreme Court ruled
unconstitutionally in this matter. It is also obvious we have allowed
America to be RULED unconstitutionally for over 100 years, which is
what got us into Obama's National Defense Resource Preparedness
Executive Order mess in the first place.
According to Alex Jones and Info Wars,
Obama's National Defense Resource Preparedness Executive Order gives
government the "authority to seize all
communication (from television stations to CB radios), confiscate all
food resources (including farms and farm equipment), take control of
all transportation (including your family car), and compel you at
gunpoint "under federal supervision" to work as a
slave".
Allow me to point out a painful political truth. Attempting
to control America and take away your rights is not just a Democratic
concept deployed by President Obama and his Congress. Republican
President George Bush (the father) and his Congress set the stage for
Obama's unconstitutional Martial Law Executive Order with their own
unconstitutional Executive Order 12803. Bush's
"Infrastructure Privatization" Executive Order 12803 essentially sold
everything in the United States to elements of the New World Order
(NWO) controlling the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In the minds
of treasonous government, since Bush sold America to the IMF on April
30, 1992, Obama can "seize all resources at
gunpoint" forcing you to "work as a
slave" because you no longer own any "resources". Of course the concepts of
unconstitutional Executive Orders and declaring Martial Law in America
is lawfully ridiculous, but it works when most Americans don't know
their rights.
Why are we living under all these unconstitutional laws?
The broad answer is we have been betrayed by the majority of so called
"governmental representatives" for more than 100 years. Allow me to
explain how their "deceptions of perceptions" were implemented in
America. In essence, Congress created an additional United States with
different forms of laws and government.
The Founding Fathers created the Country United
States as a "lawful" Republic under the Constitution for the
United States of America. A Treasonous Congress created the
Corporation UNITED STATES as a "legal" Democracy under the
Constitution of the United States of America. Executive Orders
and Martial Law are unconstitutional in the Country known as
the United States under its "lawful" Republic, but anything goes in
the Corporation known as UNITED STATES under its "legal"
Democracy. The trick has always been convincing Americans they live in
a "legal" Democracy where everyone's rights can be violated instead of
a "lawful" Republic where individual rights are
protected.
I am aware of only one publication explaining how this
betrayal took place while also deciphering every legal trick used to
take away our freedoms. The name of the book is American
Freedom A Conversation with America for "Change" in the UNITED
STATES available on the Internet at American Freedom Books. The first two
chapters of the book explain the difference between "legal" laws
(unconstitutional) and "lawful" laws (constitutional) and can be
downloaded free on the website.
It should be obvious to every American what the
Democrats and Republicans working for the
Corporation UNITED STATES have planned for the Country
United States. I think the Founding Fathers would call their plan
Treason! Some of our more prominent figures in government and the
judicial system are members or associates of the Bilderberg Group,
Council on Foreign Relations, and/or Tri-Lateral Commission. These
three organizations control the world and are filled with members of
the New World Order (NWO) with additional international members in the
United Nations. At the college level, we have the Skull and Bones
Fraternity at Yale, which currently grooms wealthy Elite children to
lead us in government once they graduate. Let's look at a list of our
Presidents or candidates who are members or associates of the
Bilderberg Group, Council on Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral
Commission, and/or Skull and Bones Fraternity:
- President Jimmy Carter Democrat - Council on
Foreign Relations and charter member of Tri-Lateral Commission.
- President George Bush (the father) Republican -
Council on Foreign Relations and charter member of Tri-Lateral
Commission.
- President Bill Clinton Democrat - Council on
Foreign Relations, Tri-Lateral Commission, and Bilderberg Group.
- President Gerald Ford Republican - Council on
Foreign Relations and Bilderberg Group.
- President Richard Nixon Republican - Council on
Foreign Relations.
- President Dwight Eisenhower Republican - Council on
Foreign Relations.
- President Herbert Hoover Republican - Council on
Foreign Relations.
- President George Bush (the son) Republican - Skull
and Bones.
- Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton Democrat -
Bilderberg Group.
- Presidential candidate John McCain Republican -
Council on Foreign Relations.
- Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich Republican -
Council on Foreign Relations.
- President Barack Obama Democrat - not an official
member of either organization but attended 2008 Bilderberg Group
meeting with Hillary Clinton when running for President.
This long list of probable traitors to our United States
Country is most likely a who's who list of high-level
government employees working for the New World Order's UNITED STATES
Corporation. They do not seek office to serve; they're put
before us as candidates to act as Special Interest agents of control.
Allow me to expose the blueprint behind the recent "legal"
(unconstitutional) strategy leading America down the path to permanent
membership in the New World Order.
- Republican President Bush (the Father) signs
Executive Order 12803 selling America to foreign investors. Many
might recall Bush made many speeches while President calling for the
creation of a New World Order. His Executive Order 12803 gave him
the "legal" (unconstitutional) leverage needed to sell the assets of
the United States Country to elements in the New World Order
while acting as agent of the UNITED STATES Corporation. The
UNITED STATES Corporation is a partner of the IMF
(International Monetary Fund), so selling America to the IMF was a
lucrative global investment for the UNITED STATES
Corporation.
- Democratic President Clinton signs Executive Order 13037 on
"Capital Budgeting", which defined Americans as "Human Capital" property of their UNITED STATES
Corporation. Becoming "Human
Capital" means all Americans are corporate "legal" assets
with no "lawful" rights in their UNITED STATES Corporation.
- Republican George Bush (the son) spends eight years
in office violating the Constitution, starting two wars, and
shredding our rights based on keeping us safe from terror he and
Dick Cheney likely orchestrated on 9/11. Creation of Patriot Act and
Homeland Security had nothing to do with protecting us from
terrorist. These organizations, along with the FBI, CIA, NSA, and
IRS are actually designed to create an army to protect the UNITED
STATES Corporation from us.
- Democratic President Obama is elected with the hope
of "change" and fails to change anything. Obama continues Bush's two
wars, and later Obama and a treasonous Congress pass the
unconstitutional National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) suspending Habeas Corpus and giving the Military the
"legal" (unconstitutional) right to arrest and detain Americans
indefinitely without a trail.
- Democratic President Obama goes on to sign the
recent peacetime Martial Law National Defense Resource Preparedness
Executive Order, with no lawful constitutional "legislative Power" to
do so, while most members of Congress watch.
Based on the evidence, it appears Democrats and
Republicans working for the UNITED STATES Corporation
have been setting the United States Country up for a potential
military coup for some time now. Obama's latest National Defense
Resource Preparedness Executive Order, creating some sort of peacetime
Martial Law, is more of the same treason. The good news is Executive
Orders and Martial Law is unconstitutional. The bad news is most
Americans, the Military, and Police are not aware Executive Orders and
Martial Law is unconstitutional.
On the subject of Habeas Corpus, we need not be too
concerned when treasonous courts and governments suspend the Writ of
Habeas Corpus. Fixating our attention on Writs of Habeas Corpus is a
very old legal trick. A Writ is simply "an order
issued from a court". The VI and VII Amendments to the
Constitution guarantee Americans "public
trial" in criminal prosecutions and "right of trial by jury" in civil cases where the
value being fought over exceeds twenty dollars. The last time I
checked, the VI and VII Amendments to the Constitution were a higher
form of "lawful" law than a "legal" law Writ of Habeas Corpus issued
from a potentially treasonous court. As long as the "lawful"
Constitution for the United States of America exists, it will
remain unconstitutional for American Citizens to be indefinitely
detained without a trial using NDAA with or without Habeas Corpus. If
a large amount of Americans become aware of their "lawful" rights we
can stand up to the "legal" government. Writ of Habeas Corpus is
mentioned as a "privilege" in the Constitution, whereas the VI and VII
Amendments to the Constitution are "rights" guaranteed by the
Constitution. Lawful constitutional "rights" detailed in our founding
documents supersede legal "privileges" "issued
from a court" working for a treasonous
government.
This is how freedom could end in America-with legal tricks
most Americans know nothing about. Treasonous elements of the New
World Order own and control the UNITED STATES Corporation, and
this entity is at war with the United States Country.
In truth, Congress should never have allowed America to be involved in
a world economy. America's participation in a world economy does not
benefit 300 million Americans when the jobs go overseas; it only
benefits elite Special Interest Corporations in bed with the UNITED
STATES Corporation. One world economy leads to one world
government, which leads to the New World Order.
Whether America falls to traitors in the UNITED STATES
Corporation is up to us. If you're a member of the Police or
Military, or if you know someone in the Police or Military, they need
to know how this "legal" Democracy UNITED STATES Corporation
versus "lawful" Republic United States Country game is
being played. You can't take a rope from around your neck if you have
no idea the rope is around your neck. At the Federal level, we have
the 544 members of Congress and the President outnumbered 300 million
to 545. With education of the armed masses, including the Police and
Military, this is a fight for freedom we should
win. |
|
|
|
|
|
