And, once again you are equating circumcision with salvation. If I am wrong on the issue (and, unlike with other aspects of theology I am 100% convinced I am right on this - I wouldn't make such an absolute claim on other things) then it has no bearing on salvation. We are saved through a living faith in Christ. Circumcised or uncircumcised, it makes absolutely no difference to God through Christ. Roman Catholics don't circumcise, most Protestants don't circumcise. No Christian I've ever met in my personal life circumcises.

I know it is hard to find a denomination where one "fits in", but do you really believe that say 90% of Christians from the beginning of the church to now are all wrong on this issue? Was Paul wrong to tell people that if they allow themselves to be circumcised believing the law has merit, that they cut themselves off from Christ?

By believing circumcision is of value, you are cutting yourself off from Christ, you are denying that there is no more to be done because Christ has done it. Christ died our death, and, if you want to try and look at it from another point, consider this - that Christ was circumcised in the place of men.

Circumcising a baby boy will not impact his salvation at all. To be saved, he will need to accept Christ into his heart and have a living faith. If he does this, then he will be saved, regardless of whether he is circumcised or not. As Paul says to believe circumcision has any value is to cut off from Christ. And note the hidden depth of that - "cut off" symbolising the "cutting off" of the foreskin. Circumcision is totally unnecessary. We put our faith in Christ. The question is, do you believe enough? Do you trust Christ enough not to circumcise? Do you believe Christ is our one and only savour?