I've read so many stories about chelation, but every story I have read involves someone who is going through the chelation process but is not yet better. Is there any scientific cases of a successful improvement in health after the chelation process?

I ask this because I'm about to begin the process myself, but I feel disheartened at the amount of stories that I have read of people who have been on the process for 2+ years and have still not seen improvements.

I am not cured but improved a lot and still improving.

You have to chelate with the cutler protocol if you want to get well.

http://home.earthlink.net/~moriam/ANDY_INDEX.html

It is the only one that really works.

Hi find the truth,

Speaking from your own experience (and those around here), my question would be whether it's worth it to pursue the protocol to get better? I mean whether your improvement is worth your pain and cost?

I know there are risks involving in chelation...I have read bad experience of people who got worse when they tried to chelate. I also know some of "success stories" (not only cutler, but other method as well). One thing that struck me is the proportion of fail stories and success stories are glaring ratio (can I say one in a million? It's just a saying, not to be taken numerically). I know there are many reasons that can be list out to explain the differences. But sometimes it's just feel like another 'gambling' notion, given the high risk and low probability of success. Anyone want to comment?

Yes.



According to my own experiences and research chelation (if done properly) has a high probability of success with rather low risk.

If you don't do it properly(this means anything other than the cutler protocol at the moment) it is a high risk low probability thing and should be avoided like the plague.

Thank you for your answer. Though it's still a long way to go for me, it certainly help me to make the decision.

I am glad to find people who can testify for dealing with this mercury. Yesterday just happened to speak with a doctor friend and (since this is mainstream doctor) she questioned whether the mercury is really the culprit of all of these. According to her there is no medical evidence that proved mercury is the culprit.

I guess this is part of the whole cover up issues...that even doctor would say such thing.But yeah, i guess the proof is in the pudding

May I know how long for you to take Cutler protocol till you 'feel' much better? Thanks

I bought Cutler's book online a few days ago, as you're not the first person who has suggested his protocol to me. So I'm going to give it a read and begin chelation. I'm just prepping my body at the moment - making sure it's not over-burdened.

When you say you are not cured but have improved alot - I wonder if it's placebo or measured improvement?

For example - How is your immune system? How do you feel on a day to day basis? Could you go out and have drinks with some friends? Do you still get brain fog?

The placebo effect is rather weak and not lasting in my experience.

The effect that i got is way to potent to be a placebo effect.

So the improvements are not in my head.

How do you measure improvements when your are mercury toxic?

According to mainstream doctors i was perfectly healthly when i was most toxic.

I think the cutler protocol will cure me eventually it is only a question of time.

Like a fellow chelator said:

How is your quality of life prior to starting chelation, and how long are you doing it now?

My quality of life is much better after 50+ rounds with DMSA+ALA