Sure, everyone has to decide on their own.

Of those links you just listed, the first post was mentioning that DMSA was causing low neutrophils which is a serious condition if left to continue.

Additionally, someone mentioned DMPS causing kidney pain which is sort of funny because that's one of the prime complaints of DMSA and I've experienced it myself.

As far as DMPS not being FDA approved- the FDA approved amalgams...need we say more?

From what I've read, DMPS is out of patent so there is no money for someone to put a generic drug through approval for millions of dollars. DMSA is ONLY approved for pediatric lead poisoning, not adults or mercury use- but of course people still use it. I've read plenty of clinical studies where it was used without any issues.

That's again why I say it's important to find a doc to monitor the process- it's important to know for example if your neutrophils drop or liver enzymes elevate.

I think there's a misconception that chelation should be painless and easy- but when you're drawing out huge amounts of a neurotoxin I think we should be thankful it can be done at all.

Many people on the frequent dose boards are looking for adrenal and thyroid meds but aren't even following the basics and taking antioxidants while they chelate! No wonder they feel terrible.

Cutler says of DMPS: "More often than not people find the subjective experience of using
DMPS more comfortable and pleasant. Also DMPS seems to stir up yeast problems less." http://onibasu.com/archives/am/92858.html

I think DMPS and DMSA both have considerable downsides but right now they're the best options we have and they have considerable studies on their use so we have a better idea of the their risks.







Originally Posted by JK98
I don't dispute that DMPS chelates mercury well, however there is much written about its toxicity, and that in many places DMPS is only used as an an emergency treatment for acute mercury poisoning. Some are very worried about the possibility of kidney damage from using DMPS.

While oral DMPS at low doses is probably much safer than IV treatment at high doses, oral DMPS still has plenty of risks and is much more toxic than DNSA.

I know some people feel desperate and will try almost anything. Imo the most important thing is to be cautious.

I guess some people feel they have tried everything else and must try DMPS. Did you ever consider why DMPS is not FDA approved and why in many countries DMPS is used only for acute mercury poisoning(when someone has a very real chance of gying soon without very powerful treatment), while DMSA is so easily available in most places?

DMPS scares me, and it should scare others as well. I would like to try new things to get well, however safety is my primary concern, and I do not want to take something that might cause permanent damage. DMPS and DMSA were developed many years ago. It is surprising that there are no new chelators that safer and more effective than DMPS.







http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Autism-Mercury/message/93793

http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1353625

http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/Autism-Mercury/message/93794