It seems to me that many people report feeling worse while on chelation and use that as validation that chelation is working...however they never ultimately get better.

I've read some of the Cutler testimonials and of the few out there I admit there are a couple of compelling ones but many use words like "hope" about how they're going to be better in the future. I've found some of these people on Curezone etc. and they are still horribly ill.

For the thousands of people who do the protocol, there are at best a handful of testimonials that I've seen. The same could be said for most protocols out there. I would feel a lot better hearing from more people who are well. Even looking through the archives on a place like onibasu Cutler continuously refers to the success of ALA etc. but I can't find these people who are getting better.

I found a post from about 4 years back on a Yahoo group about a doctor who had supposedly "cured hundreds" on Cutler's protocol so I went to his website and it said they treat with DMPS IV. -_-

I'm not saying Cutler is bad or wrong...simply that for the tens of thousands of people doing this there are what, MAYBE ten testimonials? Where's all these huge successes? I find people reporting they are on their 3rd or 4th or even 5th (!) year of chelation with minimal or no improvement.

I've already found a few people online who did Cutler's protocol for YEARS but then ultimately decided to do another treatment with a doc and then finally had improvement.

Most of the people in the frequent dose Yahoo group are quick to point out other "bad" protocols when they don't work, but if someone complains that Cutler's isn't working they are attacked as somehow doing it wrong.

As I say, bad doctors blame the patient, good doctors blame the treatment.

There are probably multiple treatment options that work, I would just like to see more positive results from everyone pushing Cutler's stuff (not necessarily on this forum) over the other options.