|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Freshman Member
|
What is the safest composites/ or other materials to use for fillings when replacing large amalgman fillings in the molars?
Sounds like they're all toxic in one way or another.
Truthseeker
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,403
Master Elite Member
|
Some may be worse than others, but the issue is that a dentist will only work with what he is familiar with, and what he has in his office. He won't give you a choice of which composite material to use. I guess the main danger with composites is bis phenol A.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 30,867
Master Elite Member
|
I think there are some dentists that will give you a choice. Mine did, but I let him choose based on my Serum Compatibility test.
Don't be discouraged by quackwatch's demonization of these tests. Quackwatch is nothing more than a pharmaceutical disinformation website, as is the NCAHF.
Anyway, all dental filling types fall into broad categories:
BIS GMA (estrogen-enhancing - cancer) Methyacrylate (hard on kidneys) Ceramic (contains ~25% aluminum) Gold (high copper content) Resin (contains plastics and glass) and more.
It may be good for me to put together a page describing all of the categories along with their advantages and disadvantages.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,178
Master Elite Member
|
A mercury free dentist I corresponded with on email, who is trained in oral toxicology and understands the need for biocompatible materials, said he used only two main materials in his office to replace mercury/fill cavities.
Cerec porcelain inlays/onlays, or heliomolar HB (which is a composite, but apparently strong and reliable) and I think optibond (for the bonding material). but each dentist no doubt has his/her own particular materials they prefer to use. This dentist reckoned that these materials seem to suit most patients and he's had less problems with them.
I myself am not certain of any of them. I have cerec in my mouth after getting some old/worn composites redone. Not sure, but certainly I've not improved in anyway in health, so they were evidentally no better than what I already had biocompatible wise, but mechanically they are a stronger/durable material and can last up to a lifetime. But they apparently contain aluminium oxide and I cannot vouch for the safety in that respect, particularly as there are other sources of aluminium many of us are exposed to.
Very tough to make a decision. I chose from a serum compatibility test (blood serum testing by Clifford labs). I also had another test done, so I tried to chose the best out of what showed up ok on both forms of testing. I still am not 100% that what I have in my mouth is not affecting me in some way....
I guess it is very much down to the individual's own biochemistry.
|
|
|
|
|