Hey Tom,

In kindness and respect with humor...

You're quite a writer. Looks like you could write up your own set of federal laws, statutes and ordinances.



So many lessons, so many rules. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />



Wow! This is quite an assumption. Tom, you're simply out of context. Did you even read my post?

I have no obligation or desire to provide you with the information you want to prove or disprove these things in your mind. That is not my job. Please understand this. I'm simply sharing the information I've found through my extensive research and providing references where people can go and search them out for themselves. I am the watchman on the wall, not a tutor.

Also, I have not written these responses for your benefit (at least not specifically). I've been quite certain from the beginning how you would respond to these things all along. I've written them for those who are watching this conversation and who have the passion and concern to search them out for themselves. Whether or not this includes you is entirely up to you.

I've been in the know long enough to see many people who desire to have their homework done for them. They want all the facts laid out in a row for them to make their own 5-second judgement. It's not gonna' happen my friend.

Those I'm interested in communicating with are those who know better than to think they will find all the evidence they need about conspiracies on a forum. They won't. This is a subject that requires some work, some external resources and some time to put the pieces together.

Honestly, it's everyone's individual job to decide whether or not they want to put forth the effort to seek out the truth for themselves. All I can do is exactly what I've done, share my conclusions based on my meticiulous research; Be the watchman on the wall.

The rest is your job, my friend. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif" alt="" />


P.S. (and Reminder): You're the one who drew the original conclusion on another thread—that "the Bible is ambiguous". In accordance with your own laws, statutes and ordinances, perhaps you could prove this for the class.

Oh, that's right. You already have. You said that because people have differing opinions on the Bible, this means the Bible is ambiguous.

Ahhhh... Nothing like solid conclusions based on evidence right the source. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smirk.gif" alt="" />
(innocent sarcasm, no hurt intended).

Someone's hasn't been studying their lessons. <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif" alt="" />