|
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 30,867
Master Elite Member
|
|
After more than 30 years
US District Court issues injunction to stop compulsory vaccination
|
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 12th, 2009 - For Immediate Release:
30 years after compulsory vaccination became US Law:
US Court issues an injunction to stop it and to hold the the government and drug companies responsible for reactions.
A
Preliminary Injunction to stop mandatory vaccinations has been issued
in the United States District Court of New Jersey. This comes after a
federal lawsuit opposing forced vaccines was filed in that court by Tim
Vawter, pro se attorney, on July 31st with the federal government as
defendant. When the judge signs the Preliminary Injunction, it will
stop the federal government from forcing anyone in any state to take
flu vaccine against their will. It will also prevent a state or local
government from forcibly vaccinating anyone, and forbid any person who
is not vaccinated from being denied any services or constitutional
rights. Vawter's filings included a Complaint, and several pages of
evidentiary Exhibits.
Vawter's
legal papers have been written not only for filing in federal court,
but additionally so they can be looked at by activists around the world
for ideas on filing lawsuits in their own countries to help stop forced
vaccinations. Vawter believes that as the truth of the dangers of flu
vaccines continues to become known, banning the forced use of them will
eventually succeed on a worldwide basis. He cautions people to avoid
fear and keep themselves focused on the task of blocking forced
vaccination.
Preliminary Injunction will immediately halt mandatory vaccinations in the U.S.
The
Court, having heard the Motion for Preliminary Injunction and read the
papers in its support, states in the Preliminary Injunction that it
appears the federal government has engaged in some amount of negligence
with regards to failure to properly investigate the safety of the flu
vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009-2010, and the evidence
submitted does warrant a more thorough investigation into the safety of
the flu vaccines.
The Court ordered that the government shall be
forbidden from forcing any person to be required to take any influenza
vaccination against that person's free will and free choice. The
government will not allow any state or local government, or any party,
to force any person to be required to take any influenza vaccination
against that person's free will and free choice.
U.S. government sued for gross negligence and violation of the Constitution
In
his Cause of Action, Vawter charged that the federal government has
engaged in gross negligence by funding and promoting flu vaccines that
are proven to be dangerous and manufactured with little oversight. The
vaccines scheduled for use in late 2009 and 2010 contain heavy metals
including thimerosal mercury, which have been proven to cause autism in
children with lowered immune systems, and other dangerous and toxic
ingredients. The federal government has stated it will force these flu
vaccines onto the American public against their will, under a document
signed by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.
He
further charged that the vaccine makers stand to earn billions of
dollars selling vaccines, and are already spending tens of millions
advertising a "Phase 6 Pandemic" that the evidence shows does not
really exist. The federal government has not required the World Health
Organization (WHO) to show evidence of such a pandemic. There has been
no collection of facts, sworn testimony, witnesses being questioned,
hearings being held, or lie detector tests being given when
preposterous statements have been made. The WHO declared a massive
"Phase 6 Influenza Pandemic", even though only a few hundred people
worldwide had so far died of this swine flu virus, and when far more
people die each year of regular flu.
Vawter noted there is a
preponderance of evidence to show that the federal government so poorly
trained its employees that they eagerly agreed with the unsubstantiated
claims of the WHO in the face of evidence to the contrary.
Forced
vaccination would violate the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution by
allowing the government to enter homes and force people to be
vaccinated, or to forcibly remove people to another location for
vaccination. It would also violate Fifth Amendment Constitutional
rights by depriving people of liberty without due process of law.
Vawter
charged that the federal government has engaged in gross negligence by
failing to properly investigate factual evidence submitted by esteemed
medical professions over many years which proves flu vaccines have
caused serious damage to people. The CDC has stated that thimerosal
mercury is being used in the new flu vaccines being prepared.
The
government has failed to investigate profiteering. Billions of dollars
in vaccine sales can cause organizations to falsify threats so as to
cause unwarranted public hysteria leading to forced vaccinations.
The
government is guilty of gross negligence because its employees failed
to properly investigate the release of a case of live swine flu virus.
One of the main companies the government deals with, Baxter Vaccines,
was apparently involved in the transporting of live bird flu virus that
was released on a public train earlier this year. A lab technician with
the Swiss National Center for Influenza in Geneva had traveled to
Zurich to collect eight ampoules, five of which were filled with the
H1N1 swine flu virus. However, failure of the dry ice in their
container allowed pressure to build up, and the ampoules exploded as
the train was pulling into a station.
The highly reputable UK
newspaper "the Telegraph" reported on July 2nd that flu vaccines tested
on homeless people caused twenty-one of them to die.
Vawter
charged there is a preponderance of evidence to show that government
will not provide people being vaccinated with a list of the vaccine
ingredients and possible negative side effects before they are
vaccinated. Most of the public will not know this flu vaccine contains
thimerosal mercury.
Vawter submitted an Order to force the
government to publish vaccine ingredients and side effects, and to give
this information to everyone who takes a flu vaccine, and do so at
least 3 days prior to their vaccination. A denial of this order would
violate Plaintiff's rights to demand the government obey the First
Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by requiring it to engage in freedom
of speech. The First Amendment not only allows a citizen to have
freedom of speech himself, but it allows a citizen to demand his
government engage in freedom of speech when it is promoting the use of
such as these vaccinations to the public.
The government
proclamation stating a person cannot sue for any damages he receives
from the flu vaccine, completely bypasses the congress and the court
system in violation of the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution which
grants the right to sue to recover for damages. Vawter submitted an
Order to deem unconstitutional any proclamation, rule or similar law
that forbids people from suing for damages resulting from the vaccines
of 2009 and 2010.
|
|
|
About Australian Vaccination Network, Inc.
The AVN is a non-profit, volunteer-run charitable association. Since 1994, the AVN has provided information and support to the general community who are trying to make informed choices about vaccination and health. Their lobbying in Federal Parliament has ensured that compulsory vaccination for children has not come to pass and they are the major reporters of vaccine adverse reactions to ADRAC (The Adverse Drug Reactions Advisory Committee).
|
For more information visit www..avn.org.au or ph 02 6687 1699
Fax: 02 6687 2032 Mobile: 0414 872 032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
