Originally Posted by LindaLou
I think I see now -- you're claiming that scientists have to re-define decay rates because you think decay rates change.

I've got a lot of information to share with you as to why this is not the case. Should I start now, or would you like to present any information yourself first? All the two studies you linked to show is that decay rates are being defined with more precision. Maybe you can start by explaining how exactly you think decay rates changed in the past or are changing now. I'll warn you that you'll have to be prepared to deal with some science.
Both my links show clear and undeniable changes in the rates of decay. One shows changes in the decay rate of 90Sr, and the other shows changes in the decay of 92Sr. Can you read or not?

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson