|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
'About' is a subjective assessment. Objectively, both links report changes in decay rates, something evolutionists claim is impossible. You're playing funny little words games. My comment was, You'll notice that both of these links are about identifying decay rates with more precision. That's not a word game at all. There is a big difference between subjective and objective matters. Your assessment was a subjective red herring. (Now for those who are exclusively emotional, the objective may seem invisible. I grant you that much.) These reports also demonstrate the reluctance of real-world scientists to challenge evolutionism's sacred cows. This is another issue that will allegedly win a Nobel Prize for anyone who can demonstrate it. Decay rates change. Why aren't these folks proclaiming the news for all its worth and campaigning for their rewards? We're told there's nothing they'd love more than to overturn the dogmatically-held beliefs, so why aren't they doing it? Guess that's just one more piece of patently false propaganda... Decay rates change. That's reality. Now either close your eyes and go on like you never found out, or start dealing with the truth. What'll it be?
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
