|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
You'll notice that both of these links are about identifying decay rates with more precision. 'About' is a subjective assessment. Objectively, both links report changes in decay rates, something evolutionists claim is impossible. The rest of your post does not address this fact. Either you miss the point, or you desire to divert attention. You want folks to think the half-lives used to generate evodates have been investigated more thoroughly. If this be the case, someone has some screwed-up priorities indeed! Disputing Genesis is more important than nuclear reactor safety? I cannot argue that people who think that way don't exist - I've seen too much quackery, pride and selfishness. One hopes they're few in number.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
