Don't you know, Russ, that one of the rules about arguments-from-spam is that you must address them all at once? It's not fair to debunk one or two lies at a time. Also dubious is the application of actual logic. If you didn't cheat so much, LindaLou'd always win.
LOL. That's great.
Yes, we live in the world according to LindaLou.
Still laughing.
How do you get large evaporite layers when even a small layer takes a long time to form? How do you get blueschist, limestone or varves from a 6,000 year old earth and a flood?
When the flood occurred, it carried away some layers while leaving others. It also rapidly formed some structures, such as the red cliff structures in the western U.S.
Some layers that didn't get washed away indeed took long periods of time to form, and as an old-Earth Creationist, I have no problem with this.
Nevertheless, young-Earth Creationists bring forth very strong evidence of creation-activity that did occur about 6000 years ago, and this evidence should be respected and duly considered. This evidence supports the Biblical model.
As I understand the Bible, it does not demand a young Earth, only a "renewed" Earth, as stated here:
http://urlbam.com/ha/M0020Nevertheless, to be prudent, we must consider all the evidence.
