In post 52493, I linked to the radiometric studies. I linked to a Wikipedia article about polystrate trees in the Flood thread. I truly don't understand what you think they prove. Your short video only claims that they are a "problem," as creationists love to do, but only because they have mistaken beliefs about scientists being "uniformitarians" in the sense that they don't think anything, ever, can form rapidly (which is nonsense).

Quote
So, is it fair to say that you believe that a variety of fossils have not been found around polystrate trees?


No, I said index fossils, because you made an earlier claim that a variety of index fossils from different places in the fossil record had been found in the strata of a polystrate tree. You'd need to discount the possibility that they had been washed there from other strata that had eroded and this would depend on an examination of the strata and the surrounding area, which is what a geologist would do. If you can substantiate your claim then please do so.