It is quite unfortunate that I find that you are not dealing with one of the fundamental issues with dating:

Human corruption.

We have those who have come out and have explained that dating methods are very often ("usually") calibrated to "date" fossils according to the layer they are found in.

When you put the pieces of the puzzle together and realize that evolution is a social control, and that so much "evidence" supporting it is fabricated in some way or another, then we understand why such corruption can occur. In short, someone is supporting a false premise, must as the myriad of false, faked, and mis-summaried medical studies that show the safety of thing, like NutraSweet or Vioxx, for example.

The amazing fact that I've learned about people over the years is that they will do virtually anything to keep their job. When they are told that a date has to match this or that value, they most often comply.

The ones that do not comply, as least not for long, are Christians. They eventually come out of the corruption and expose it.

Unfortunately, we live in a day when many people don't want the truth. They have been so indoctrinated into believing that the truth is difficult, or bad in some way, that they are more than willing to accept an "alternate" truth, and so they do, and this surprisingly easy to do because...

It's easy to sell false evidence to someone who wants it.

Now, I have raised the question of corruption here, which is a valid concern, but even the evolution debaters that used to be here before they were banned for impersonating others (lying) recognized that there are fundamental issues with conventional dating methods.

Without delving too deep into what they are yet, I will mention that when I was in school -- about 25 years ago -- the age of the Earth was about 300-million years.

If my calculations are correct, that makes me about 4,300,000,019 years old.

Oh, the things I could get done.