Funny. In post 52493 above, you said...



Oh well.

In my previous post, I'm referring to polystrate fossils in relation to dating. You still refuse to accept the models that where built and demonstrated in the video, but you make no explanation why you reject this science.

Perhaps you've changed the subject (as evidenced above) so you don't have to reply to the science I've presented, but that is up to you. I don't know your motivations.

The piece you linked to about PS fossils is what we call a fluff-piece. This is what you write when you have no real evidence. You fill in the piece with all kinds of related well-known facts and try to make it seem like ("feel" like) you really said something scientific.

The lazy onlooker reads the boring, unrelated facts in the beginning, then they get tired of looking for an answer, skip to the end, and then the summary makes it sound like they explained the problem.

Again, this is not science. It is propaganda. It's disheartening to see young people today so easily deceived, but generations of dumbing-down are clearly having an effect on our world.

Well, it you care to tell me what you don't like about the science video explaining sedimentation, feel free.