|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
For those who may be new around here, or simply never gave the matter much thought, the #1 assumption of evodates is NO FLOOD. Water dissolves different substances at different rates, and exposure to water is an excuse used to throw out evodate results they don't like. ('Leaching' and 'migration' are good terms to include if you go to google about this stuff.) Therefore, using evodates to dispute the flood is circular. Their methods have that assumption already built-in. While I'm posting, I suppose I'll recommend http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/forum/index.php?act=findpost&pid=26023
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
