From what I understand, you believe that the earth is older than 6,000 years though not billions of years. I wonder why you let all these videos "do the talking" for you when you don't actually agree with everything they're saying, since Hovind and the others are most certainly YECs. You do believe the standard YEC position that life on earth is only 6,000 years old and that there was a global flood. Is this correct?
For the 12th time, yes, I believe the Earth is much older than 6000 years old.
I present these videos to show that there is evidence of a "young" Earth, but that I believe this is really evidence of a renewed Earth, as I've stated numerous times previously.
Honestly Linda, I have read some of the articles on talk origins, and they are horrible.
Just like the article that I rebutted:
http://urlbam.com/ha/M002AThey simply make assertions and then "name" archeological discoveries as being evidence for their position.
This is not science. It is soviet-style indoctrination.
I am continually astounded by the irony that people claiming to be intellectual accept this dribble as science.
But then, I know the Bible is correct when it says that the god of this world has blinded the people of this world. But of course, the people are blinded willingly.
You are very judgmental of the Bible, which is ironic for one who has read it -- or perhaps some of it -- one time.
You also have a lot to say about evolution, but when I read your follow-ups, you are simply parroting from other websites and throwing in a few big words to sound "impressive".
This is not science, and the search for truth is a very serious business, as the judgement of your life will be based on the things you do in this life.
Just remember this when that state worker wants to put that tattoo on your right hand.
