This is off topic here, but a link for you to look at CTD:
What About Carl Baugh? A Commentary by Answers in Genesis

I made this point to show that like Hovind, Baugh's credentials are questionable; but regardless of that, polystrate trees are not a problem for geologists, evolution, etc. You've made claims that Russ ought to be able to disprove what I said in my last post. Let's see if he does. In the meantime I'm wondering what your own post above is contributing to the discussion. (?)