OK, we've got two videos here from Hovind and now one from Carl Baugh, he of the "Paluxy Man-Tracks." Even AiG reject that claim. If you read in more detail about it, you will find that he and/or his pals are hoaxers.

What he says in your video above presents no problem for geologists. As I have stated before, we know that some strata form relatively quickly. The problem for you is that if even one kind of rock forms slowly, the earth cannot be a mere thousands of years old. Please explain how blueschist, limestone or evaporites can form quickly.



Several problems here:
a) Your video makes no such claim;
b) You have not given any evidence that this is true;
c) You still seem to be convinced that the only way geologists date rocks is by index fossils. Russ, this is OBVIOUSLY WRONG and you're making yourself look silly by continuing to believe it.

Find an example of a succession of index fossils that existed significant periods in time apart from each other, all found in the layers of one polystrate tree, and you can go some way to trying to back up your claim. Until you do, this will be filed under the heading, "stuff creationists make up."

I also notice that you are again not reading/ignoring everything I have previously posted here. It all disproves what you/your videos (same thing) are saying. Are you not going to try to make a case for yourself at all? What do you think that is showing people here about your position?