The fossil patterns you see a few sites around the world (that evolutionism has entitled the "fossil record") form through the sedimentation model that is presented in this video:

http://urlbam.com/ha/M002C

The layers do not represent increments in time, they represent other factors that affect how quickly and efficiently they "settle".

This model is physically demonstrated by working models in this video.



A global flood did not create a "layer", so to speak. It's more complex than that.

In some areas where water receded slowly, you see layering. The layering is different in sloped areas. In area where you have fast runoff, the existing layers are stripped away.

You see, this is a complex problem (that you have) that is well explained by the dynamics of a global flood.

One thing we would expect to find with a global flood is marine life fossils in unusually high places. We do.

The global flood model solves ALL of these problems.

Your incessant belief in transitional uniform layering is not what we find in the field.



Simply by the laws that govern sedimentation, fossils will arrange themselves in a flood scenario in predictable orders.

Hence, we see some consistency in the ordering of fossils in some parts of the Earth.

Again, a global flood solves all of the problems and is the best model to explain the evidence.


"I feel that the effect of hypotheses of common ancestry in systematics has not been merely boring, not just a lack of knowledge; I think it has been positively anti-knowledge . . Well, what about evolution? It certainly has the function of knowledge, but does it convey any? Well, we are back to the question I have been putting to people, —Is there one thing you can tell me about?' The absence of answers seems to suggest that it is true, evolution does not convey any knowledge."

—Colin Patterson, Director AMNH, Address at the American Museum of Natural History (November 5, 1981).