Each and every one of your arguments are based on assumptions and a very narrow belief falling within a very narrow set of contrived parameters.

Herein lies the fundamental problem with your argument.

You claim that this type of sedimentation only happens in certain environments, but in reality, this "environment" includes the entire land mass.

Why?

Because of the global flood -- Yes, the flood that you continue to deny all evidence for.

Furthermore, the geologic column IS OLD! It's an old concept that was invented before this type of sedimentation was widely known.

So you may ask, "Why don't they just change it?"

Well, here is a concept that you need to learn to consider in your world view that explains this very "human" problem:

"I know that most men, including those at ease with problems of the greatest complexity, can seldom accept even the simplest and most obvious truth if it be such as would oblige them to admit the falsity of conclusions which they have delighted in explaining to colleagues, which they have proudly taught to others, and which they have woven, thread by thread, into the fabric of their lives."

—Tolstoy 1828-1910
As quoted in "Chaos: Making A New Science", James Gleick



In reality, you've left human and corporate agenda out of the equation.

As I've said, many have come forward and admitted that fossil dates are set to match their supposed "layer" so that a simple, publicly consumable model can be presented that supports your (and their) favorite religion:

Evolution.

Your blind trust of this first hand testimony -- which is consistent with so many other areas of science and research today (areas that I have first-hand knowledge of) -- is fantastically naive.

This is the way the world really works Linda, and as much as I know you despise the Bible (which you know little about), it does predict biometrics, and the short trip to hell that goes along with it, which is why the information-brokers keep manipulating you away from the Bible.

The scary thing is that you have become an unwitting accomplice to their crime.

Not good Linda.

Evolution is clearly a social control, not an observable science, and since science is a process of observation, evolution has to be taken on faith, and is therefore, by definition, a religion.

This statement is pure fact.

The reason you keep rejecting it is because you have not studied subjects that help you connect what is currently happening in "science" and politics with the larger agenda.

This is not a joke or a game. Life has been created to fulfill a purpose. Don't die not knowing what that purpose is. Especially don't remain willfully ignorant of life's purpose.

That is truly a dangerous and selfish thing to do.