Linda, you're regurgitating the same old, outdated and mythical claims.
And yet such unsupported generalisations from you do nothing to erase the evidence that contradicts you.
Your entire argument is based in the idea of horizontal layering. But horizontal layering occurs in a way that does not denote age by depth.
This fact is not only well-known and widely accepted, but it undermines your entire belief system.
Nor does denial of reality erase the evidence that contradicts you. You seem to be saying that because Russ says these are lies, then these are lies. Horizontal layering is a basic geological mechanism. What is your alternative model for how rock layers are deposited?
What's more, in the quote you cited and as I've said before, we see in the geologic column that trilobites are in lower layers, dinosaurs above those, humans above those. These are never found mixed. Do you have evidence that contradicts this?
radiometric dates are "adjusted" to date fossils with THE DESIRED DATES based on the layer they appear in
Do you have evidence for your point above or are we again supposed to believe in a conspiracy of lies because you said so? Look in detail at radiometric data and you will see that the decay curves reflect the decay rates of daughter elements. And a hint for you: not all radiometric dating is done to confirm the age of fossils. Fossils have been found in rocks whose provenance has already been established, which would seem to contradict your conspiracy of lies idea but by all means let's see your proof. IMO your slander of scientists in order to support your personal beliefs knows no bounds.
Again, this is a myth based in circular reasoning and ancient depth-means-age claims.
occur in uniquely narrow time periods in certain strata, which means that if you find a fossil such as
Stringocephalus, you know you're looking at a Devonian layer because across the world that is the only place where this fossil is found. Index fossils were an aid to geologists in the past who were working out relationships between rock layers using relative means. Index fossils are today but one of many methods of establishing geochronology. You have evidence to contradict this?
Your quotes have been taken out of context and are irrelevant to the above information.
If you're going to claim it's all lies, Russ, the least you can do in order not to insult people's intelligence is provide some proof.
