Linda, you're regurgitating the same old, outdated and mythical claims.
This is a clear sign of desperation. You are holding on tight to your religion (evolution) that you so desire to be true.
I hope one day you give into science and let these outdated claims go.
Rock units generally occur in horizontal layers, only certain combinations of species will occur in the same layers, and there is a certain pattern to what species occur as one reads from top to bottom.
This is the crux of your claim.
Unfortunately, your information is fundamentally comprised of propaganda and it is littered with assumptions and myths.
Based on the fact that this post blatantly contradicts previous claims you have made, I'm tempted to remove it. You can't even maintain a consistent argument.
Your entire argument is based in the idea of horizontal layering. But horizontal layering occurs in a way that does not denote age by depth.
This fact is not only well-known and widely accepted, but it undermines your entire belief system.
Additionally, this fact combined with the numerous scientists who have come out and admitted that radiometric dates are "adjusted" to date fossils with
THE DESIRED DATES based on the layer they appear in, rather than actual dates helps us understand how deep this deception goes.
In short, they falsify alternative dating methods to make it look as if these dating methods support their date-by-layer claims.
Just as government organizations (FDA, et al) work for corporate interests, the field of paleontology has been controlled by special interests -- namely evolution fundamentalists -- for decades.
http://urlbam.com/ha/M002CSo, when a geologist in Britain observes a certain fossil species in the rock unit she is studying, she knows that that particular unit is "Devonian".
Again, this is a myth based in circular reasoning and ancient depth-means-age claims.
We know more than we did 50 years ago Linda.
See this video for information about how circular reasoning is used to mis-date fossils:
http://urlbam.com/ha/KI'm not sure why you are maintaining these ancient arguments except that you have nothing better to hold on to. But it's your faith. If you want to rely on outdated claims to support your desired religion (evolution), that's your choice.
"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology."—Professor Steven J. Gould, Harvard University
"It is a mistake to believe that even one fossil species… can be demonstrated to have been ancestral to another."—Dr. Gareth J. Nelson, American Museum of Natural History
"The hold of the evolutionary paradigm [theoretical system] is so powerful that an idea which is more like a principle of medieval astrology than a serious twentieth century scientific theory has become a reality for evolutionary biologists."—Michael Denton, Molecular Biologist, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985), p. 306
"In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to `bend' their observations to fit in with it."—H. Lipson, "A Physicist Looks at Evolution," Physics Bulletin, 31 (1980), p. 138.
