You have so far not presented any evidence here that the geologic column is a myth
Actually, I have.
I simply have not done it on your terms:
No videos,
No external links,
Must rewrite all information in your own words on this forum.
Sorry sister.
I gave you the truth. If you reject it, it nobody's fault but your own.
As far as the rest of your arguments go...
EVERY ONE of them is based on vast assumptions. For example, using the reasoning of tidal stress maintaining a molten core over a long period of time is highly debatable, and easily refuted.
Just do a YouTube search and you'll find a few more modern opposing arguments.
I know the trusty onlooker will have the due diligence to do their homework.
You will find no claim of "fossils date rocks and rocks date fossils" in textbooks. I have shown you clearly here that this is incorrect, most obviously so. What he was probably showing you is relative dating methods, which are used along with absolute dating methods, though no doubt he conveniently omitted the latter.
I like you better than Linear because you make me laugh harder.
So, for you, seeing referenced pictures is just not enough evidence.
You are a tough cookie to satisfy.
Finally to repeat my previous comment, the changes in organisms over time are simply what they are, and they can be observed in the fossil record. Any concept can be misunderstood or abused. People have done the same in the past with the Bible yet you don't dismiss it because of their beliefs or actions.
No, what you actually see in the "fossil record" is sediment settling and natural layering.
The fossil record is an age-old myth.
There is no better example of picking and choosing "evidence" than the so-called "fossil record".
Here it matches. There it doesn't. Here is sorta' looks similar. There is doesn't look anything like it.
Oh well. We'll just pick the one's we like.
This is the way the world works Linda.
You have made comments in the past that scientists would promptly adjust their theories and beliefs if new evidence was found.
This is completely untrue.
We know that untrue and outdated information continues in the textbooks to this day, and I know the reason:
It is propaganda because a faith in the evolution religion facilitates a new world socialist government, among many other things that are desirable to the powers-that-be.
As said it before and I'll say it again:
Your world view is: Fantastically Naive.
At least I respect your stamina.
http://urlbam.com/ha/u"One of the determining forces of scientism was a fantastic accidental imagination which could explain every irregularity in the solar system without explanation, leap the gaps in the atomic series without evidence [a gap required by the Big Bang theory], postulate the discovery of fossils which have never been discovered, and prophesy the success of breeding experiments which have never succeeded. Of this kind of science it might truly be said that it was `knowledge falsely so called.' "—David C.C. Watson, The Great Brain Robbery (1976).
