|
|
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 30,867
Master Elite Member
|
is plain dishonesty to claim that you have evidence of the alteration of a definition then refuse to produce that evidence. You are lying. You are being disingenuous. I am not surprised that judgement will soon come on this world considering the arrogance it is full of. The hard fold fact is this: It is a lie to call a fossil "transitional" when there is no proof that it came from a transitional form. And to justify usage of the word "transitional" simply because fossils have similar features is plainly, blatantly, clearly, undeniably, deceptive. You certainly must know this. Again, I will point our trusty onlookers (most who DO have integrity) to the deceptive talk origins article about this subject. http://urlbam.com/ha/M002AAs for you: I have lost all confidence that you have integrity.
|
|
|
|
|
