So to remind you of an earlier discussion -- when he revealed that he thinks the sun burns by combustion, and it was pointed out that he was incorrect, this was an "attempt to discredit him"?
Is that the best you can do to "discredit" Hovind?
Very weak. Very weak indeed.
He most certainly was using a simple, generic word in a context that has nothing to do with technically describing how the sun works.
It's like me saying, "My car is running."
You should know that I don't mean literally "running".
Linda, this is poor.
I think the scientists who published those articles in scientific journals would not be so convinced by your offhand assertion that it is all "bad research." Feel free to pick one of these methods to illustrate how it is invalid.
I'm not speaking about dating methods being invalid, although a good argument has been made by many credible scientists that they are bad. I am speaking at to their integrity in reporting the research.
Your argument is so bad on its face that people may ask themselves what they are missing.
They are not missing anything. There is no geologic column.
They have constructed the concept of a geologic column myth by selecting sites they like. Then they just throw out all the information that doesn't fit their desired model.
Again, this is not science. It is mythology and storytelling.
This is the way the world really works. It's important that people don't simply blindly accept what they are taught and told.
Test it. Ask questions. Do research. Don't have blind faith in what people tell you.
Fossils are not used in any of the dating processes mentioned or linked to above, nor are they necessary. I'd abandon this old claim if I were you.
This is how it is being taught in textbooks. Hovind provides visual evidence of this. I've see it myself.
This false information in the textbooks is an artifact of the agenda that is behind the promotion of evolution.
Let's keeps things in context Linda.
Yet you have so far not presented any evidence here that the geologic column is a myth, nor have you been able to falsify any of the information I have presented which shows it is a reality.
Yes I have.
So if I did the same, we'd each just be posting videos all over the place here with no obligation for us to understand them or even watch them. Don't you think God gave us a brain for us to use?
You really crack me up.
I just get such a kick out of debating with you.
I'm not surprised. When people believe in something strongly and aren't willing to question it, then naturally they will want to cheer on whoever champions their cause, no matter how faulty their logic or meagre their evidence.
Well said.
Bunkum. The change in organisms over time has nothing to do with these things, whatever spin people want to put on it, you or anyone else. I'll let you carry on this discussion with Linear elsewhere because this thread is about the geologic column.
I am again laughing.
Have you ever read the Humanist Manifesto?
Do you have any knowledge about the subject your are using the word "Bunkum" in response to?
You are amazing.
Just keep it coming Linda.
