The original question is nonsensical and rhetorical. That was my point.

There is no such thing as a beneficial mutation unless you believe that complete, interdependent subsystems complete with feedback modulation systems form in a single mutation.



Evolution contradicts the established law of thermodynamics.

If you think differently, please explain.



Again, the point is that thermodynamics demands that processes stop with balance and simplicity. Life is very complex and regenerative because it is based on machines.

Let me give you an example.

An internal combustion engine works on the bases of an imbalance. This is true of all machines that produce motion.

The imbalance is expressed as the pressure difference between the top of the piston and the bottom, which produces motion.

That fact that the machine works is not evidence that it created itself.

This is -- in essence -- what you're saying.

The machine was created based on a set of rules to product a predictable outcome under a certain set of conditions.

Yes, complex molecules exists, but ask yourself: What happens to them when they are placed outside of their "created" environment.

For example, what happens when a watermelon is disconnected from it's supporting machine -- the plant from which it grew?

It breaks down, not builds up.

This is so simple that people are sometimes inclined to believe that there is something so complicated and terrific about evolution that they must be "missing something".

No people. You're not missing anything.

What you are witnessing when you witness trained professionals express a belief in evolution is the power of money and social pressure.

Both are blinding to the intellect, and all are subject to their seduction.

Know yourself.

"In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to `bend' their observations to fit in with it."

—H. Lipson, "A Physicist Looks at Evolution," Physics Bulletin, 31 (1980), p. 138.

"I had motives for not wanting the world to have meaning, consequently assumed it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption . . The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics; he is also concerned to prove there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do . . For myself, as no doubt for most of my contemporaries, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation. The liberation we desired was simultaneously liberation from a certain political and economic system and liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom."

—Aldous Huxley, "Confessions of a Professed Atheist," Report: Perspective on the News, Vol. 3, June 1966, p. 19 [grandson of evolutionist Thomas Huxley, Darwin's closest friend and promoter, and brother of evolutionist Julian Huxley. Aldous Huxley was one of the most influential liberal writers of the 20th century].




(1) Does the sun produce complex organic molecules? No.

(2) What is the ultimate end of the sun? Simple matter.

Just because a process joints a few atoms together does not means thermodynamics is being broken.

The process is simply following known and well established chemical laws -- laws that follow the 2nd law.

Do you believe the sun violates the 2nd law?



Simply put: No transitional forms exist. The question is nonsensical.

That is -- again -- the point.



They are unspoken publically.

There are many who come out of the profession and admit to what is going on.

"The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology."

—Professor Steven J. Gould, Harvard University



Incorrect.

The high probability is that you would end up very near to where you started.

It would be simple to simulate this with a computer program.



This is another nonsensical statement.

"Priests" that torture people are not following the commandment of Christ. They are, in fact, not priests at all.

It would be like saying, a kid bullied and killed another kid because his mother told him to go buy some milk.

Native Americans have benefited greatly from the truth and teachings of Christ. Christians have been generous, feeding and clothing, and educating people the world over.

Don't blame Christ or the Bible for the things that impostors do.

Did you know that an evolutionist killed a little girl?

Your reasoning is plainly nonsensical.



The inquisition is not a Christian event. It is an anti-Christian event.

Christianity has brought freedom and prosperity to many over the centuries.

The inquisition was intended to keep the knowledge of the liberating Bible out of the hands of the people, because the Bible taught that people answer to God only, not to "other men".

Well, these "other men" didn't like that idea, so they has to kill the messenger. So they did. They killed Christ, and now they are attempting to snuff out the liberating knowledge of the Bible.

Ironically, evolution is desperately promoted by the same people who promoted the inquisition.

In short, you are promoting the inquisition. You are on the wrong side fella.

What an incredible irony.

Study.



Selective breeding is not changing the design. It is changing select features within the design parameters.

You have claimed to be an engineer. You should know this.



This is not a tactic.

I was responding to your statement related to the outcome and ethical implications of evolution.

Evolution justifies genetic manipulation.

Why?

Because if the organism was "created" through a process of errors, it's likely that we can improve it.

On the contrary, if God created all things, then it is good just the way it is. In short, don't mess with it.

This is one of the fundamental purposes of evolution: Genetic manipulation ultimately for power and profit.

This philosophy will end in global disaster.

Thanks evolution. Maybe you should have listened to the Christians.

I implore all people to watch this:

http://orbisvitae.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=49524&an=128#Post49524



Your stubbornness and rebellion are evil, and when you spread your false beliefs, people get hurt. Sometimes they die.

If you would simply humble yourself and listen to Dr. Tenpenny present evidence from refereed medical journals rather than parroting what you were told in grade school, you would not be such a danger to society.

Yes, Linear. I hate to have to be the one to break it to you, but...

You've been lied to.

Wake up.

I emphatically urge all parents who love their children to watch this video:

http://herballure.com/vp/strbc


That would be a republic.[/quote]

You mean like the republic of China.

Or do you mean the USS Republics.

You see Linear, the term republic by itself does not mean anything.

It's the law that is used that matters.

You really do come across as the poster child of the new world order.



Biblical law was changed.

OK. I'll say it again, just for you.

Evolution was created (how ironic) to facilitate the dissolution of the Bible.

The Bible is the basis for a Christian republic.

The creators of evolution hate a Christian republic because power is in the hands of the people. They don't like that. They want the power centralized, like in the "new world order" socialistic system which we are now entering into.

You see Linear, Evolution and the republic are very entangled.

You really have a lot of un-learning to do friend.



Wow, you are really evil.

You know as well as I do that this video contains a ton of FREE information. Yes, the guest is selling a book, but the video is free...

You're welcome, by the way.

Yes, some of the founders of the U.S. were ushering in masonic religious symbols and such. Yet, the U.S. became a republic based on Biblical law.

Unfortunately, the U.S. population has been drugged into apathy by the evolution-believing banking elite; An idealism you are promoting, by the way.

Biblical law brings liberty and personal responsibility.

Evolution-based socialism brings tyranny.

This is exactly why I have no respect for the belief of evolutionists. They know so little about their religion that they actually promote the very things they say they hate.

Another incredible irony.



Absolutely. They are allied with each other.




You have no idea how the world really works.

It's called "infiltration" leading to "controlled opposition".

Infiltration would not work if the infiltrator came in preaching against all of the things that target group believed.

Infiltration is a subtle process leading to controlled opposition.

Controlled opposition is the concept of controlling your enemies camp so you can make sure they are unready when you attack.

Controlled opposition also dampens the blows of the enemy.

For example, Shawn Hannity is a controlled opposition figure.

He says all of the things Christian conservatives want to hear. When CC's hear someone preaching their grievances publically, they tend to listen/watch the show, and then feel better.

When they feel better, they don't do anything politically... Which is precisely the point.

You demotivate the enemy by soothing them emotionally.

Another example is Ron Paul. Besides having been seen giving masonic handshakes in the past, he was the man who completely disarmed the movement to expose the massive electronic vote fraud that is occurring in the U.S.

He could have called a manual recount, but he didn't. The reason he didn't is because several precincts had already been caught altering votes. Had he called for a recount, this vote scam would have been blown wide open.

Paul was "their" controlled opposition man in the right place to dampen the blow of the enemy.

(Sorry Ron Paul supporters. I love ya' and know you're good people. But the truth is, if you want something done right... Well, you know.)

You say my logic is dizzying.

Actually, the web of multilayered lies that we live under today is dizzying. I don't invent this stuff. I just research and report it.

In reality, it is your evolutionary colleagues who keep the simple truth so dizzyingly obscured.