Watching the first couple of minutes of the first video should be enough to show anyone who knows the first thing about geology that Hovind is full of baloney.

I could paste links to lots of videos, too, that refute creationist claims. I don't do this because I'd rather engage directly with discussions here, show that I understand something of what I'm talking about, and have the grace not to expect anyone to spend hours refuting a link that took me 5 seconds to post. If you could do the same I would appreciate it. How about showing that you yourself understand what Hovind is talking about, and give a piece of his evidence about the geologic column not existing -- mind that it doesn't contradict the evidence already presented here.