You would make a great politician, Linda, but only to those who have lost their ability to discern.

The article I posted stands on its own and you have not effectively refuted a single point of it.

There is no geologic column. None.

The geologic column is a concept invented to attempt to convince a naive public that evolution is credible.

Your response to this article reminds me of the time I took 2 days off from work to watch the entire Clinton impeachment hearings. It was an astounding landmark event.

After the event, two news anchors (one was Peter Jennings, now deceased), lied about what had just happened.

Yes, you heard me correctly, they lied. They spun (which is the same as lying). And they lied more and more.

After listening to their spin of the event I had just watched, I actually began questioning myself, asking if I had missed something. Perhaps they were commenting on different event.

But no! I didn't miss anything. I watched the entire event from start to finish.

The fact is, they lied. They lied for damage control.

For those who were unable to see the entire event -- which included most people -- these liars made it sound like the entire event was a political charade to pick on Clinton, when in fact, Clinton broke laws and was worthy of impeachment.

This is exactly what you do.

You read an article that has integrity and then put your spin on it -- lie about it -- in order to push your own agenda.

I truly wish you could come up with some good argument that I could congratulate you for. I wish I would say, "Well Linda, you make some good points. Let me look into that."

Instead, your claims are just more of the same propagandic disinformation that continued use circular reasoning, false evidence, and big words to make them "feel" convincing to those who's consciences are so far gone that they are unable to discern truth from personal desire.

I'm not convinced Linda. Please, give me something to chew on rather than political, emotionally-based, propaganistic dribble.

Please.