Right, so in the three recent posts here, correct me if I'm wrong, no one has chosen to address any of the scientific evidence at hand.

It has been implied that miracles happen. While people are of course free to believe this, it sends science up a dead end because you cannot empirically investigate miraculous evidence. We could all have been created yesterday and had false memories implanted. Besides, some of the things we do see seem a little odd. For example, if the earth is young, why would God go to such lengths to make it appear old. Why would he also make sure there was no record of a global flood in the geologic column and instead create all evidence to point to there not having been a flood.

Russ has also chosen not to address any of my comments apart from the one where I refused to watch two and a half hours of . . . well, I said I'd resist the impulsive desire to express my opinion on the subject. I'm going to have to say that until Russ chooses to back up his wrongly-dated shoe claim with some evidence, it will remain firmly in the subjective arena. (I'm being as polite as I can here.)

I also made some specific comments about these oil videos, which have been ignored. Russ you just told me recently that creationists don't engage in diversionary tactics. Care to comment on where all the biomass came from, or how it's impossible that any of the earth's oil can be old?