Since you are regurgitating posts (something you accused others of doing in the past), I will do the same:

Your quote is nothing more than a biased editorial comment. Of course a devout evolution-fundamentalist will support his church.



Is this the best that he can do: Fault him for referencing established research?

Weak, very weak.


Actually, this (below) is an excellent and effective article. All should read it and make up their own minds.

http://www.discovery.org/articleFiles/PDFs/survivalOfTheFakest.pdf

"It is therefore of immediate concern to both biologists and layman that Darwinism is under attack. The theory of life that undermined nineteenth-century religion has virtually become a religion itself and, in its turn, is being threatened by fresh ideas. The attacks are certainly not limited to those of the creationists and religious fundamentalists who deny Darwinism for political and moral reason. The main thrust of the criticism comes from within science itself. The doubts about Darwinism represent a political revolt from within rather than a siege from without."

—B. Leith, The Descent of Darwin: A Handbook of Doubts about Darwinism (1982), p. 11.