Sean, I did not mean that Shawn MUST go on a diet identical to mine. Sorry if I gave that impression. My post has already suggested that there are many healthy alternatives are available to the person who has simply excluded sugar/gluten/yeast.

I mean sugar as in STRAIGHT "sugar" (sucrose). Not the natural fructose sugars contained in fruits (unless somebody HAS to do this). I realise some people maybe more extreme like me and have to give up ALL forms of sugar, (including natural sugars and high carbs). But it does not have to be this way for everybody. And I have already messaged with Sean about that and suggested that he simply give up the obvious like sugar/gluten/yeast. And see if that alone makes a difference.

In other words, one who does try such a diet, could still probably include high carbs like fruits, potatoes, carob, non gluten cereal/grains, some milk, chips etc. If Sean can still do that? That would be great and healthy also. And I used to be able to handle such a diet. Made excellent progress too.

I think if somebody can do this alone? That in itself make allow for significant improvement after a few weeks or so of following that. Now if somebody is like me? Then they can decide whether it is enough or not.

It's great to hear you do so well on fruit. And why not? It is a natural part of our diets afterall and very healthy and a potent toxin fighter. It's only an issue if yeast is such a serious problem, that the person cannot make progress or enough progress unless they remove ALL forms of sugar. I find that extreme and frankly am not so keen on recommending this anymore, unless it's absolutely necessary.

I consider that fruit, nuts/seeds, yoghurt, vegetables of all kinds, meats, grains (non gluten), etc would be pretty ideal. and there are natural treats one can include also, as long as they are sugar/gluten/yeast free. I really do not think it's that much of a major sacrifice to exclude the obvious as a trial for a few weeks. It may feel it at first, but really it's not.