I already explained the mistake: assuming "Natural Selection".

They predict A, based upon NS. They observe B. Since NS must always be assumed, they cannot confess that this is a strike against NS. Their religion forbids, and career consciousness plays a role as well.

So, rather than "NS is falsified", they say "NS occurred, but our predictions are wrong". NS is thus not subject to testing. Therefore NS must not be science, but literary device.

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson