Mercury in vapor form will disperse somewhat equally, and so will methyl mercury (found in fish), but the mercury stored in the body does not follow any rules of magnetic equilibrium. It builds up in extremely high concentrations in certain areas of the brain including the pituitary gland, as well as certain organs of the body.
How do you explain changed symptoms like a back pain totally dissapearing and reappear as leg pain after extraction of an amalgameted tooth?
New magnetic equiliburum on the magnetic resonance frequency of the mercury atom!
In english, after extraction of an amalgam tooth, you take away the field that the amalgam was emitting. If you then has more amalgam left in other teeth, then their fields will change due to the removal of one field (extracted amalgam).
The SUM TOTAL complex dynamic multipoled magnetic field, is made up of it's membering sub fields.. I.e... (example of 3) amalgams has one own field each.. Those 3 amalgams produce 3 fields that interfere with each others in a constant flux! That flux is the sum total magnetic field of the 3 fields (amalgams).
The sum field is in a flux... constantly oscillating, but it may appear static when messure as a sum... however... If you take away one of the member of the total field, ie. extract one of the three amalgams, then you change the TOTAL field, and it's poles.. Hence... the total field is what emitts into the body as a whole, and when that field gets new poles or a new polarity vector, then stuff on that fields magnetic resonance frequency will be influenced (In this case, a field of mercurial atomic magnetic resonance). Therefore, other particles whit that frequency in the body will re-allign to the new polarity vector and it's amplitude (distance).
Therefor, people are experiencing changed symptoms after removing 1 of 3 teeth with amalgams... And also therefor in Bex's case, she could handle garlic well when she had one amalgam left, but couldn't handle garlic allmost at all when she was completely amalgam free! WHY?
I'll tell you why....
When she had one amalgam left, she had one field left with a polarity vector and an amplitude, WHICH mag-locked mercury in her body into an alligned "gridlock" more or less.. When she tried to mobilze mercury, then she did, and after that when retoxing, the mercury always returned in alignment with that one remaining field of the remaining tooth!
BUUUUUT, when she removed the last amalgam! and no longer had emitting fields whatsoever from her jaw(s), then there no longer was a powerful "master" field in her body to set the allignment for bodily stored mercury! The only fields left now is the individual small-fields of each mercury atom in her body. Each mercury atom in the body ofcourse repells or attracts to eachothers due to their fields...
However, when there was no huge masterfield from teeth amalgam left, that is when she couldn't handle garlic well no more, or sulphur as well. BECAUSE, only small amounts of sulphur mobilized wildly in her. Why? Because no powerfull masterfield from her mouth emitted a magnetic alignment field no more.. And therefor the merc mobilized more wildly in her than before, because the stored mercury now sat more loosely magnetic locked... infact now it wasn't locked at all no more, so therefor more easy mobilizement!!! And after retox when the merc will settle down again, it will settle randomly because of no big magnetic field to align with due to no more amalgam in the teeth!
So... Elementary physics.
Change one part of a field that consists of many fields, and you get a new field sum. And it's the field sum's amplitude and polarity vector that says where mercury will store in the body! Change that, and mercury will automaticly seek new equiliburum over a short time! Take away ALL fields, and you cause alignment CHAOS! (No alligment at all), and then you will more readily mobilze wildly when mobilizing!
It's the same with salt in water.... It's the same with everything.
And it's logical!
My god i only hope this will not make me impopular on here.. I'we been bashed before for sharing such highflying info...
If you know your physics, then you will see the logic in what i'm trying to say.. that simple.
gdawson6... Garlic does not chelate mercury?! Yes it does! Ofcourse it does.. If DMSA chelates due to its dual thiols, then garlic will also chelate due to it's singular thiol!! Besides garlic also has other mechanisms like converting mercury into kidny secretable mercury salts!
About the singular thiol in garlic.. I'we heared from some moron on the net on place that single thiols only mobilizes and not binds.. only chelators with dual or more thiols will chelate because the first thiol frees mercury, and the second thiol binds to the mercury that the first thiol freed.. Well it's not that simple. The dual thiol chelators improves the chances of binding, but a singular thiol chelator will also bind, only with less probability!
So sulphur food alone and especially garlic will mobilize and bind, and also convert mercury into watersouluble salts!
But yes, it's probably safer the more thiols the "chelator" has got. That will increase it's binding probability factor meassured againt it's mobilizing capability.
So DMSA may be safer yes, but garlic for example has most of the support chemicals in natural form in addition. So while garlic is only singular thioled, the garlic also gives the body what it needs to build it's own glutahione, and therefor at the same time enables the "body natural" chelating / excreting capabilities!
Presto!
Abra cadabra and Amen to that!
It's not only Cutler that can educate himself.... I am fully capable of logical deducing myself thankyou.
Belive this or not, your choises, i'm not bothering to find all my bookmarks leading to these conclusions, but i have read like a cat with mustard in its colon running to its death. I have read like h*** i.e
Sorry for that expression but its a saying in my country...
I know what i'm talking about here.
Am i arrogant? why? because i'm dead sure of my deductions?
I don't think so. Feel free to disagree, it's peoples rights, but.. Know your physics if you want to validate this.
I have connected the dots for this from many sources on the net.. i have bookmarks, but to map out all the dots from all the bookmarks would take to long time and effort.. so i'm not bothering, but the info leading to these conclusions, is out there for sure!
Kindly, Ole.
