Despite Being Made of Dust, I Push Ahead! ((( Smiles )))

" He himself well knows the formation of us, remembering that we are dust."
---Psalm 103:14..

In a physical way, we are dust, " Jehovah God proceeded to form the man out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life,
and the man came to be a liveing soul."
[Genesis 2:7]

This simple discription of man's creation is in harmony with scientific truth.
All the elements of which the human body is composed are to be found in the " dust from the ground."
A chemist once claimed that an adult human body is 65 percent oxygen, 18 percent carbon, 10 percent hydrogen, 3 percent nitrogen, 1.5 percent calcium,
and 1 percent phosphorus, with the remainder being made up of other elements.
Weither theses estimates are wholly accurate is unimportant.
The fact remains we are dust"!

Indeed, that the Grand Creator was able to create man from the dust of the earth in a fear inspiring and wonderfull way increases our appreciation for His unlimited power,
skill, and practical wisdom.
---- Deuteronomy 32:4, footnote; Psalm 139:14...

In the midst of a dying world...
We all make our choices who we want to believe!
And why we want to believe it.
And for me that choice is what I believe to be true not out of plain ignorance..
What billions believe to be true that is in a Creator of the universe and for that I shall rejoice in Jehovah God!

I look around the world as is and not only do I see the footsteps of God but I also see prophecy in the news and events on this planet.
The evidence is so overwhelming to me but maybe not to everyone.
I cannot make anybody believe in what they don't want to believe in for whatever reasons.
Even though they may say if I just had the evidence that we did not evolve and the Bible is fact.
Well a person can except that kind of evidence or not but not all evidence will become apparent till all prophecy is fufilled.
But I do agree it's a matter of faith and I'm saying on both sides.
There are highly educated men and women who do not advocate the theory of evolution.
" I found many scientists with private doubts," writes Frances Hitching in his book The Neck of the Giraffe, "
and a handfull who went so far as to say the Darwininan evolutionary theory had turned out not to be a scientific theory at all."

Chandra Wickramasinghe, a highly acclaimed British scientist, takes a similiar position.
" There's no evidence for any of the basic tenents of Darwinian evolution," he says.
" It was a social force that took over the world in 1860,
and I think it has been a disaster for science ever since."

Time magazine, while saying that there are " many solid facts " backing the evolution theory, neverless concedes that evolution is a complex tale with
" many holes and no shortage of competeing theories on how to fill in the missing pieces."
Scientist T.H. Janabi observes that those who advocate evolution
" have developed and abandoned many erroneous theories over the years and scientists have so far been unable to agree on any one theory."

Interestingly, Charles Darwin anticipated such a conflict.
In the introduction to The Orgin of Spieces, he wrote:
" I am well aware that scarcely a single point is discussed in this volume on which facts cannot be adduced,
often apparently leading to conclusions directly opposite to thoses at which I have arrived."

Indeed, such conflicting testimony raises questions as to the credibility of the evolution theory.

And even if all scientist agreed on only one and one theory
alone.
It is founded upon on events that no humans have ever witnessed or duplicated.
They have not witnessed the spontaneous generation of life; yet they insist that this is how life began."
For example, scientists have never observed mutations- even beneficial ones- that produce new life-forms; yet they insist that this is how life began.
Such lack of evidence causes T.H Janabi to call the evolution theory " a mere faith."
Physicist Fred Hoyle calls it the " Gosple according to Darwin."
Dr Evens Shute takes it further.
" I suspect that the creationist has less mystery to explain away then the wholehearted evolutionist," he says.
Other experts agree, " When I contemplate the nature of man," admits astronomer Robert Jastrow, "
the emergance of this extraordinary being out of chemicals disolved in a pool of warm water seems as much amiracle as the Bibical account of his origin."

So when a scientist actually creates a breathing liveing man out of the dust or a dog or cat then maybe I could say..
Wow..
There's something to that theory so called fact now fact..
But as it takes billions of years so to say and nobody was their to verify it like that back then.
This is the facts of the events that I base my life on.
And I have read the disscussions on this site and my answer still remains the same.

Even though the evolution theory is claimed to be an indispensable foundation of science.
This is an indispensible foundation of my faith in God.
Thats the simple answer but otherwise..

Self-replicating molecules?
Will do as well..

It's a lengthy subject one well discussed on this forum.
The deep divide is as wide as Noahs flood.
And you know it is too.
Untill the very end of time.
Will there be that divide.
Of thoses that trust in God's word as the truth of the event.

Stay Well..
As always..
Lynn