My choice to quit responding to CTD is not based on agreement with him. His last post exceeded the bounds of believability.

I never thought CTD was unintelligent, but if he believes what he said about repeating the half-life experiment then I would have to reevaluate my assessment.

If he expects others here to buy into what he said then he has a very low opinion of those who agree with his side of this debate.

Regardless, his expressed opinions on the debate regarding evolution are no longer worth commenting on after this. It is obvious that he is only concerned with using semantics to win the debate in the eyes of those who already agree with him and don't care one whit about truth in the details that he presents.

I will continue to respond to those who present an intelligent argument.