So you discount anything that is unobserved?
It depends on the situation. Obviously, judgement calls have to be made as to how the evidence supports the hypothesis.
The problem with judgement calls is that people have a hard time not being biased. Sometimes, that bias is caused by bribes of one form or another (NutraSweet phenalyanine study for example). Sometimes there are job threats or even social pressure.
Show me any documented cases of increases of mercury in children who have been vaccinated.
The problem with studies that show what you are asking for is that the way mercury was measured was faulty, and when you consider what the researchers already knew about the process of mercury excretion, it's obvious that the study outcome was predetermined. Unfortunately, I don't have permission to show you the clip of Dr. Haley explaining how this happened.
Nevertheless, this is just another example of corruption and "science".
Show me documentation of the planting of explosives in the WTC towers.
We don't know of any, but common sense says this: If explosives took down the buildings, then they must have been planted at some time.
Name one decay curve that is does not follow the exponential decay paradigm.
I can't because the data is not yet complete for many of the decay curves, especially the long ones, which, of course, are the ones that we're interested in when examining the age of the Earth.
Again, we don't know if the curves are exponential (to say they are is an assumption) and we don't know if there are other factors that existed that changed the decay rates.
Name one condition that substantially affects (what we are told is the length of) radioactive decay rates.
Human corruption.
Again, there is a large agenda behind the promotion of evolution. This is why it is being used as a social control.
http://urlbam.com/ha/M0026"The problem of the origin of species has not advanced in the last 150 years. One hundred and fifty years have already passed during which it has been said that the evolution of the species is a fact but, without giving real proofs of it and without even a principle of explaining it. During the last one hundred and fifty years of research that has been carried out along this line [in order to prove the theory], there has been no discovery of anything. It is simply a repetition in different ways of what Darwin said in 1859. This lack of results is unforgivable in a day when molecular biology has really opened the veil covering the mystery of reproduction and heredity . .
"Finally, there is only one attitude which is possible as I have just shown: It consists in affirming that intelligence comes before life. Many people will say this is not science, it is philosophy. The only thing I am interested in is fact, and this conclusion comes out of an analysis and observation of the facts."—G. Salet, Hasard et Certitude: Le Transformisme devant la Biologie Actuelle (1973), p. 331.
