Originally Posted by Russ
I believe the honest assessment is that we really don't know the age of the Earth.
This quote is followed by an almost word-for-word reiteration of your previous unsupported claims.

I will concede that the age of the Earth claims by physicists and geologists cannot be exact. I never said it was exact.

How far off do their assumptions (which you claim are wild assumptions) make their estimates? 1 order of magnitude? 2? 6?

What qualifies you to determine that their assumptions are "wild"?

What is it about their assumption that radioactive decay follows a particular pattern, observed in short-lived isotope decay, that makes it a wildly inaccurate assumption?

A faith that connot survive collision with the truth is not worth many regrets. -- Arthur C. Clarke