|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,315
Master Elite Member
|
I'll tell you what I note:
I note that your challenge has proven every bit as bogus as I cannot doubt everyone already knew it to be. I take it that you are unable or unwilling to provide an example of an evolutionary scientist who refers to a mutation in a way that does not mean changes in DNA. So be it. Unwilling. There are links available in the thread I already linked to. You ignored/forgot the discussion once already. And moving goalposts isn't exactly the most impressive way to string out a discussion. Your first challenge has been met. What's the point of this? You knew, I knew, everyone who's spent any amount of time on this or any similar forum knew that there are several definitions of 'mutation'. We looked in detail at a definition from a dictionary. Is there a scientific meaning of the term that you know of, that is clearly something other than "change in DNA"? You appear to have refused to tell me what your own definition is and simply tell me (not for the first time) that you gave it at some point. I didn't see it in the link you provided. You could provide it right here, right now and there'd be no way I could "ignore" it. Sure you could. Don't underestimate yourself so.
Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson "And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson
|
|
|
|
|
