If life on Earth has existed for almost four billion years , do you need to have an example of a transitional species for every year , every 100,000 years , every million years or what period of time in order to support the theory of evolution?
I certainly understand the point of your question, but here's the problem.
We don't have fossils that prove transitional forms exist.You may ask, "Russ, how can you say this?".
I would reply, "I'm simply repeating what scientists have said."
Here, read it for yourself:
direct lineages are not required; they could not be verified even if found.
This confession from the talk origins website is true.
So, think about it. If we cannot prove direct lineages even if they were found, then why do we assume that they exist. In fact, why do they deceptively call them "transitional fossils" when transitional fossils cannot be proven?
Secondly, think about the phrase in the quote, "even if found".
This is clearly an admission that directly lineages have not been found. If a direct lineage fossil is a transitional form fossil, and a direct lineage fossil had not been found, then why do some arms of science continue to repeat the mantra that transitional fossils have been found?
Why is there this kind of confusion:
http://urlbam.com/ha/M001kThis is clearly a lie; A deception. The only question left is:
Why are they wanting us to believe this lie?
Here is a link to a post that answers this question, at least in part.
At some time in the future, I would like to write a complete explanation of the connection between the promotion of the evolution religion and it's role in the New World Order socialistic government that be being fraudulently thrust upon us. You must also realize that evolution is the self-proclaimed belief system of secular humanism (this is their statement, not mine):
Evolution Solves All Kinds of Problems:
http://urlbam.com/ha/M0026Scientists are continually filling in the gaps between species.
No they are not.
Again, according to the talk origins website, scientists only find fossils containing mosaics of similar features from different times. This is not a finding. It is an assumption based on horribly biased interpretations of fossils containing similar features.
Again, this is not intellectually honest and it is certainly not science.
"It is a mistake to believe that even one fossil species… can be demonstrated to have been ancestral to another."—Dr. Gareth J. Nelson, American Museum of Natural History
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless."—Bounoure, Le Monde Et La Vie (October 1963) [Director of Research at the National center of Scientific Research in France].
