I simply have to disagree with your reasoning.

People often make statements like:



This statement assumes that all geologists know about transgressions.

Perhaps they do now, but my statement was they they did not always know about them. And because they did not always know about them, we must ask ourselves:

Did they learn about transgressions before or after the "fossil record" was devised?

This is the key question that I am bringing attention to.

The fact is, the fossil record was devised after transgressions were known, and this point is the very point made in the Drama In the Rocks video.

Scientists are still stubbornly holding on to the visage of the fossil record even though it is based on faulty information and vast assumptions that were in vogue before transgressions were known.

This is the point.

And to be honest, we also have to consider the other problems with the fossil record, which is that it is inconsistent in different areas of the world. So mainstream science just threw out the data that didn't match what they preferred and promoted the data they did like.

http://urlbam.com/ha/K

And, we should not be so naive as to believe this does not happen in science.

It happened with thimerosal in vaccines, mercury in dental fillings, aspartame in NutraSweet, tomatoes in the tomato effect, x-rays in show sizing, the age of the Earth in the 70's and then 80's and then 90's, the safety of BIS-GMAs, the safety of incinerators, the ecological safety of coal-burning power plants, the safety of heavy metals in tattoo inks, the use of mercury in treating syphilis, and on and on and on.

We all would do well to understand two things:

(1) The propensity for humans to twist their perception of truth when a reward awaits (Nobel Prizes as in Global Warming, money as in the billion-dollar bailout, recognition as in piltdown man, salary raises as in hiding Clinton's sexual escapades, bribes as in passing Nutrasweet's phenylalanine component as safe, etc.)

(2) The propensity of humans to cover their own errors to avoid punishment or humiliation.


Propaganda is a substance that works. Evolution is propaganda used for social contol.


"Darwinism is a creed not only with scientists committed to document the all-purpose role of natural selection. It is a creed with masses of people who have, at best, a vague notion of the mechanism of evolution as proposed by Darwin, let alone as further complicated by his successors."

—S. Jaki, Cosmos and Creator (1982).